Brandon D Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Speed issue has been relieved a bit. Seems to be getting faster as I use it.
bfarber Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Part of the speed issue seems to be the member seo name caching. We cache it in the members table. When we first upgraded, those weren't "built" of course, so as people clicked around and they were building, mysql wasn't too happy. We're going to have a tool to build those upon release. ;) This is why we upgrade our forums early...to catch this sort of thing. There are other things we're looking at improving, but will probably take a little bit to investigate.
Brandon D Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 I see a lot of funky things still. I assume you guys are working on it though, so I'll wait till everything calms down :P
rct2·com Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Don't encourage him! :'( But he invented a new verb. To 'memberate'. Almost as good as to 'bfarber'. ::):
Management Charles Posted February 24, 2009 Management Posted February 24, 2009 I enjoy verbs that annoy bfarber. Proceed.
Lewis P Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Actually, customers 'memberating' should be renames 'customerating'. ;)
ehren. Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Speed isn't a problem for me.. running good as can be at the moment.. If anyone wants sprites for the buttons, just implement it on your own skin when making your skins :)
rct2·com Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 'Customerating' sounds judgemental. As in 'Customer Rating'. 'Memberating' has the feel of 'pontificating' or 'ruminating'. In that way that it was used, maybe 'customerating' is more appropriate.
Brandon D Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Where the hell is the mark all as read link =x Every post is marked as unread for me
Management Matt Posted February 24, 2009 Management Posted February 24, 2009 Right at the bottom, Brandon. The IPB 3 tracking system is not compatible with the 2.3.6 system, so all tracked data is wiped.
Management Charles Posted February 24, 2009 Management Posted February 24, 2009 Where the hell is the mark all as read link =x Every post is marked as unread for me Topic markers do not carry over in the upgrade. The link is at the top of each forum. Look for "(Mark this forum as read)"
Brandon D Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 I'm looking for the 'Mark all posts as read' link - I have to go through and mark each forum as unread? Oo
Lewis P Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 I'm looking for the 'Mark all posts as read' link - I have to go through and mark each forum as unread? Oo Right at the bottom of the forum. In the footer. ;)
Brandon D Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Oh lol Right there with the Back to top link =p
TrixieTang Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 I enjoy verbs that annoy bfarber. Proceed. XD
sunrisecc Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 Just FYI, Brandon, I did more surfing on the site. Every single page has the same error, but a different line number and character. This error is already in the Bug Tracker several times, so I won't clutter it up by reporting it there again. They all follow the form: Line: (26 or 35) Character: (3 or 4) Error: Object Expected Code: 0 URL: http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?app=forum& I saw the same thing. Then I saw that the upgrade change my Pro Skin choice to the new Lo-Fi one. Once I updated that field to the new default, the errors disapperared.
FunInAustralia.com Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 The new skin looks great so far guys, congratulations! I look forward to seeing the bugs being ironed out over the next few weeks, then I'll probably upgrade.
Mark H. Posted February 24, 2009 Posted February 24, 2009 I saw the same thing. Then I saw that the upgrade change my Pro Skin choice to the new Lo-Fi one. Once I updated that field to the new default, the errors disapperared. Well I'll be damned! Same here. And now that I'm on the plain Board skin instead of Lo-Fi, you're right. No more errors. Veeeery Eenteresstink!
CynicalFrost Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 Yeah. I will have to say I was about to raise hell that they pushed a IPB 3 with broken javascript onto the board here. But little did I realize that it was the skin choice... Good thing I clicked around a bit.
sunrisecc Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 Well I'll be damned! Same here. And now that I'm on the plain Board skin instead of Lo-Fi, you're right. No more errors. Veeeery Eenteresstink! Now added to my upgrade TODO list, switch all members who are using the Pro skin to the default before starting the upgrade.
TrixieTang Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 Now added to my upgrade TODO list, switch all members who are using the Pro skin to the default before starting the upgrade. I just reported this as a bug, so you might not have to switch everyone's skin.
sunrisecc Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 I usually have switched all non-default skin selections to the default for every major change. (ie when the skins undergo a major change). It is safer.
_Diesel_ Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 I usually have switched all non-default skin selections to the default for every major change. (ie when the skins undergo a major change). It is safer. Ditto.
Bain Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 So far I am unimpressed with IPB 3. We were told to expect a great looking skin design that would blow us away... where is it? If the current skin is it... some people have low standards. This current skin is comparable to the pro version of the IPB 2.3.X series. Now the features of IPB 3 is awesome! But to me the looks are most important, features are secondary.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.