November 30, 2006 in Feedback
I some times use the send message in my own profile to send my self a reminder.
you need to put these in the bugtracker if you want them to be seen officially.
They're not really bugs, though.
Things I've found that are similar to this, I reported and usually were fixed.They sound like bugs to me :)
Send it to the bug tracker and if they are actually considered bugs they'll be fixed. If not, the worst that will happen is they will be seen as "Working as intended".
I think fast reply box looked better the other way. What I don't get is why they change things without many saying theyw ant them changed. I saw nowhere where many people were complaining about the picture resizing in sigs feature, yet they took it out because someone didn't want that also. I needed that feature really.And when you have already added someone as a friend, it still has the add friend link, and as you said in your own menu it has the link too!
What happened to fast reply?
I think fast reply box looked better the other way. What I don't get is why they change things without many saying theyw ant them changed. I saw nowhere where many people were complaining about the picture resizing in sigs feature, yet they took it out because someone didn't want that also. I needed that feature really.
And when you have already added someone as a friend, it still has the add friend link, and as you said in your own menu it has the link too!
what a cute avatar you have :)
These are not bugs, and I wouldn't bother reporting them to the bug tracker. ;) Especially at this stage, I wouldn't expect these sort of changes for 2.2.0.
Well some of them look like bugs some are fine.
whats the point of having this section of the board open then?
^ its a feedback forum not a request new features forum.
This is still feed back though.So what is the point.
The fact he said it would be considered, as all feedback is.
ok well I just started to see this section of the forum as pointless as bugs needed to be posted in bug tracker and suggestions need to be in suggestions and from what I have seen none of the feedback I have posted was even considered.All I got was a lot of people picking on me for my opinions or people misunderstanding them and I explain them and then get heck for explaining them.
#2 is a bug (they should move the EMail link up and get rid of the second PM link, or get rid of the first PM link)#7 isn't a 'bug' per se, but should be fixed#1 and #3 are intended#4, #5, #6, #8 and #9 are feature suggestions
This forum is for feedback, which is exactly what this topic is. This is indeed the type of feedback we are looking for too, so I thank the OP. :)I was just stating that at this stage it is unlikely that any more non-bug related changes will make it into 2.2.0. That does not mean we won't continue to tweak the new things for 2.2.1, 3.0, etc.
Ok thank you.
We use hundreds of php functions - we won't be checking each one at install time. There are VERY few proprietary functions that are a problem - namely GD functions, and those functions can be disabled from the ACP.
[b]Fatal error[/b]: Call to undefined function xml_parser_create() in [b]/var/www/localhost/htdocs/forum/ips_kernel/class_xml.php[/b] on line [b]256
And its easy to check if these functions (mostly *external* functions) are build in with get-loaded-extensions and get_extension_funcCheck for disabled functions with ini-get (get-cfg-var only reads direct the ini value, ini-get uses the runtime var).Should be easy to check the simple things that are needed for ipb / idm /ipg or blog
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Started 3 hours ago
Started 4 hours ago
Started 4 hours ago