Quillz Posted August 22, 2005 Share Posted August 22, 2005 I've noticed that the Forum Jump automatically activates itself. For example, if you use it to quickly jump to another forum, you're automatically re-directed, and thus, have no need to use the "Go" button to the right. Why not just remove it entirely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted August 22, 2005 Share Posted August 22, 2005 Some browsers or browser installs don't automatically react the way they are supposed to. It's probably better left there for compatibility. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rοb Posted August 22, 2005 Share Posted August 22, 2005 Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabien Posted August 22, 2005 Share Posted August 22, 2005 I not agreed. If the Javascript isn't enabled, one needs the button "Go" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillykins Posted August 23, 2005 Share Posted August 23, 2005 I not agreed. If the Javascript isn't enabled, one needs the button "Go" Exactly. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Griego Posted August 27, 2005 Share Posted August 27, 2005 It's needed if you want to return to the first page of the forum you're in... not just compatibility, that could be done by wrapping the button in <noscript> tags. But if I'm in a topic and want to go to the forum index or I'm on page 23 and want to go to the first page, then the Go button is the only way the forum jump will take you there. (Because the forum jump can do this, I think the forum link next to Next Oldest/Newest is unecessary...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlf Posted August 27, 2005 Share Posted August 27, 2005 Has anyone thought of a user Option of weather they see the "go" button or not? so those that do have JavaScript enabled can "disable" it for them selfs while those that need it can still see/use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted August 28, 2005 Share Posted August 28, 2005 It's needed if you want to return to the first page of the forum you're in... not just compatibility, that could be done by wrapping the button in <noscript> tags. But if I'm in a topic and want to go to the forum index or I'm on page 23 and want to go to the first page, then the Go button is the only way the forum jump will take you there. (Because the forum jump can do this, I think the forum link next to Next Oldest/Newest is unecessary...) That's one way, or you could click on the "<<" button where it lists the different page #'s.. [ 123 pages ] [<<] [<] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [>] [>>] :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Griego Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Oh is thaaaat what the link does. :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 <_< :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krocheck Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 Leave the go button alone ... its not hurting anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 Leave the go button alone ... its not hurting anything."If it ain't broke, don't fix it"? Sounds good to me, also for the reasons of compatibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
• Jay • Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 Has anyone thought of a user Option of weather they see the "go" button or not? so those that do have JavaScript enabled can "disable" it for them selfs while those that need it can still see/use it. That would definitely be bloat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 [quote name=' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.