Ryan H.
-
Posts
4,489 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Downloads
Release Notes
IPS4 Guides
IPS4 Developer Documentation
Invision Community Blog
Development Blog
Deprecation Tracker
Providers Directory
Forums
Events
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Ryan H.
-
Something went very wrong in your upgrade... you're probably better off having them try to figure out what than reporting each of the symptoms of it as its own bug.
-
:thumbsup:
-
Nope.
-
It's the concern of those extra queries being run at all, not so much the time it might take to run them consecutively [which would be very little at all]. Splitting them off into an ajax call would only be worse: then not only do you have to run those several queries, you also have to have IPB re-initialize along with everything else that a new script call involves.
-
You already have the reason for why it's not happening. :/ It's unfortunate that queries are such commodities... this would be a great addition [not to mention all else that has been decided against for performance's sake].
-
For the sake of the skin contest, I hope it's, umm, soon. A good skin isn't exactly the fastest thing to concoct, especially when you already have a schedule to work around.
-
With smartphones that are designed to incorporate or mimic real browsers in almost every way, cutting out so much seems like a step backward, not to mention probably not being the most appreciated of moves.
-
app=forums&module=forums§ion=markasread This is boilerplate code in 3.0--it tells it what part of the code to actually go to. Every page on the forum has a similar strand, whether you see it or not. &marktype=forum This tells it what type of content it's marking as read--I don't know what other possibilities there might be, but it's for flexibility. &forumid=298 This tells it what forum you're actually marking as read. &returntoforumid=298 This tells it where to send you after marking it as read. Again, flexibility.
-
nobody else has noticed that that link is still right where it used to be?
-
ahem...
-
A similar discussion from a week ago:
-
Server-Side Includes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Side_Includes Your life would be a lot easier if you were just able to use PHP, though.
-
I've gotten that a good number of times this weekend as well.
-
I can almost assure you it's for debugging purposes.
-
sigh
-
Nah, keywords 'before' and 'in'.
-
i'm speechless.
-
Uh, last I checked June was only three months past March, and we're already half-way through that anyway. Assuming they're able to stick to the by-June statement, no more than 2.5 more months. I agree that it's taken a long time and I'm as anxious as anyone, but ranting about it does nothing.
-
Simply put, some of us have plans which sort of require having 3.0 first.
-
Ways to compensate for IPB 3.x not fully supporting IE6
Ryan H. replied to Fast Lane!'s topic in Feedback
I think that's probably unlikely... whether it falls behind the latest browsers and technology or not [and it will], it is still far enough along in standards support that there are no major discrepancies between that and the other major browsers. Assuming the basic standards stay the same, the only issues it will run into are not supporting the latest and greatest of CSS, but that is purely a visual difference and by nature it should degrade perfectly. I rarely have compatibility issues moving from what I've developed in Firefox to IE7.
