Jump to content

Adriano Faria

Clients
  • Posts

    31,865
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    475

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Projects

Release Notes v5

Invision Community 5 Bug Tracker

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Adriano Faria

  1. I had an app in IP.Board 3.4 and another dev developed one in early days of 4.0 and 100% of people, even the ones who doesn’t purchase it, said it was useless because it SHOULD have thousands of predefined events In the table to avoid enter them manually, what apparently was boring. So yes, this is a plugin where you don’t need to add records and it displays general entries from Wikipedia, as stated. No specific matters. It would have to be an app to allow people to enter their records and integrate totally with the framework (categories, search, tags, notifications, etc.) And it obviously wouldn’t cost only $10. As it won’t sell well in the marketplace, drop a PM if you’re interested in sponsoring an app or choose any of the following: https://invisioncommunity.com/forums/forum/506-customization-requests/ https://invisioncommunity.com/third-party/providers/
  2. Cloud has weird caches. Enable or disable and wait a while for the cache to update.
  3. This one is a 3rd-party that grabs data from Wikipedia... I can make as a custom job if Fandom Wiki has its own API.
  4. You mean specific topics or all of them? That will do it but it's a member option:
  5. What's New in Version 1.5.1: Fix ACP restrictions
  6. About This File This widget will display records from Wikipedia (Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_25) IMPORTANT NOTES: ONLY ENGLISH IS SUPPORTED IN THIS WIDGET Support will be provided while the API is available and functional, otherwise the resource will be dropped from Marketplace.
  7. That’s what I said here and that’s the reason I didn’t add ot from the beginning: That’s how it is.
  8. It’s tied to the group permission time to edit content. I guess they use 30 days here on IPS, if I’m not mistaken.
  9. I'm away (from my PC) until wednesday. Will take a look when I get back.
  10. The red message is the points a member has to pay to apply. The restriction points shows up in same place of all other restrictions: I didn’t take a screenshot but it’s there! You have extra fields for Applicants. You can add any field there, including Editor, where the user can choose color, attach images, files, etc.
  11. It uses the the default templates from Forums app; it doesn’t has its own template.
  12. You can choose the database:
  13. What's New in Version 1.5.0: New feature: Integrate with Members Shop from @TheJackal84 in 2 ways: Add a minimum points required to apply to positions Require member to pay X* points to apply to positions A new setting was added to enable the integration. (*) value informed by the author when submitting the position
  14. Like any other forum/category, in your ACP.
  15. There’s nothing to fix. This app doesn’t add an option in ACP.
  16. Oh maybe you’re asking because you allow your members to choose the view? If so, you can run a query to change to the tabbed view but the member will be able to switch to another at any time, as this is the goal of these buttons. The only way to make it “hardcoded” to tabs is disallow members to choose, then tabbed view will be forced.
  17. Just create your tabs and they will show.
  18. This was requested before and I won't change that. You can change restrictions IF no one has applied yet. I don't think it's fair with those who already applied to have "rules" changed (to easier or not) after they applied. Not interested now; maybe in a future version.
  19. Probably something in your theme. This is a square thumb used across the suite and works fine in default theme:
  20. I like it. Will take a look when I have to update the app.
  21. You want me to integrate it with Members Shop? How? When apply? When approved?
  22. Default doesn’t allow duplicates. There’s a setting to allow.
  23. Sorry, I don't see much sense in this. I usually don't change things that is working (at least I don't see any complaints) based in one particular situation from a single user. Sorry. Just allow to post duplicated links and you're done.
  24. @EmaxDev It’s done.
×
×
  • Create New...