Steve H Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I know this has been done for IP.Chat already and was implemented to differentiate between the old legacy chat interfaces and IPS's chat interface however it would be logical to rename the other applications on the basis that IP.Content is already using the IP.name convention. Rename all IPS applications to conform with naming convention of IP.Content and soon to be IP.Chat. Download Manager > IP.Downloads Gallery > IP.Gallery Blog > IP.Blog They are described as such in "Purchase Additional Applications" area of the same screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I don't get your point. They are named IP.Downloads, IP.Blog, etc already... :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy T Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I don't get your point. They are named IP.Downloads, IP.Blog, etc already... :blink: Ditto on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve H Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 I don't get your point. They are named IP.Downloads, IP.Blog, etc already... :blink: Where are they named that for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoo2000 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Where are they named that for you? Don't worry, I understand what you mean ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve H Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 For the purposes of those who don't follow what I'm talking about I'm attaching a SS. I marked this topic as ACP - Admin Control Panel so this was where I was referring to the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy T Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Ah I see I do not yet use IPB 3 so was not aware they were not consistant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoo2000 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Ah I see I do not yet use IPB 3 so was not aware they were not consistant. So why did you comment on it then :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy T Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I did not see the ACP part in the title until recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InvisionNutCase Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Go to the ACP Default is System, if not selected, choose now Select Manage Applications & Modules Find Chat Services, find the down arrow to the right of the green check mark and choose edit application details change the Application Title from Chat Services to IP.Chat repeat with the others no need to wait till 3.1 :shifty: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Go to the ACP Default is System, if not selected, choose now Find Chat Services, find the down arrow[img] [/img][/url] and choose edit application details change the Application Title from Chat Services to IP.Chat Don't forget to change "Forums" to "IP.Board" while you're at it. :whistle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Barrie Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Don't forget to change "Forums" to "IP.Board" while you're at it. :whistle: No, because Forums is just another IP.Board application. IP.Board is the framework. Think of it as being less of a bulletin board and more of a cork board you can attach other stuff to. System is more analagous to IP.Board these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 No, because Forums is just another IP.Board application. IP.Board is the framework. Think of it as being less of a bulletin board and more of a cork board you can attach other stuff to. System is more analagous to IP.Board these days. I was kidding dude. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 FWIW, I tend to agree we should keep the naming consistent, if nothing else for brand purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.