The Clash Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 I have to say, that for the first time since 2.0 was released, I am seriously disappointed.I upgraded my board the day 2.3.2 came out, not expecting all of the problems with it. I'm happy that a patch for the post markers was released, but what about the other problems (specificially the URL parsing)? It's been over a week since 2.3.2 was released, yet these bugs still remain unpatched. I know you're busy with Nexus and everything, and that it can be a lot of work, but really - shouldn't your top priority be the actual paying customers you have rather than the ones you're hoping to get? I'm not asking for 2.3.3 - just patches to fix the 2.3.2 problems, and fast releases of said patches. I'm tired of having to go in and edit posts to fix something that shouldn't have ever been a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atomicknight Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 Covered here: http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?...mp;bug_cat_id=3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirov Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 yap, it's true, i mean there are many problems, and lot of the bugs are with Severity bigger than 3I think IPB should release a patch with the bugs fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Clash Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 Not everyone will look at the tracker. There should be official patches released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom T Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 What like this one, that was realsed when the bug was fixed ;)https://www.invisionpower.com/index.php?app...icle&id=361I know Brandon is working his hardest to get all the bugs fixed and then I'm sure we'll see 2.3.3 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 We are going to release an update to fix the bugs. It wouldn't be prudent, however, to release one to fix the post markers, then one for the urls, then one for another issue. Nor would it be prudent to release a bug fix update for the issues introduced, and then find THAT one doesn't work properly and have to release another one.We will be releasing an update shortly to address the reported issues. I apologize for the inconvenience - we are trying to do it right though, and not rush the patch and end up breaking even more things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve G. Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 We will be releasing an update shortly to address the reported issues. I apologize for the inconvenience - we are trying to do it right though, and not rush the patch and end up breaking even more things.Thanks for the infos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Clash Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 We are going to release an update to fix the bugs. It wouldn't be prudent, however, to release one to fix the post markers, then one for the urls, then one for another issue. Nor would it be prudent to release a bug fix update for the issues introduced, and then find THAT one doesn't work properly and have to release another one.We will be releasing an update shortly to address the reported issues. I apologize for the inconvenience - we are trying to do it right though, and not rush the patch and end up breaking even more things.It would definitely be not the smartest decision to release so many updates, 1 for each bug fix. Thing is, we've been waiting over a week now, and whether it's an update or a patch, there's only been one made available in the client area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 *points to this site's version* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Clash Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 Good to know it's being tested in a live environment first. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted October 25, 2007 Share Posted October 25, 2007 ;)Fool me once.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Clash Posted October 26, 2007 Share Posted October 26, 2007 Question about the URL parsing...Once I've upgraded to 2.3, will all the URLs posted while the board was running 2.3.2 be fixed once I've upgraded to 2.3.3 and rebuilt the posts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 URL's posted to the board weren't broke exactly - it was urls that were posted, edited (and not "fixed" when the code showed up broken during editing) and then saved. There isn't an automated way to fix these urls unfortunately. Once this happens, they're stored in the database broken, and will need to be manually fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.72c24494603afd7a572d55d4a71e4af2.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.