Mark Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 It is our aim to have IPB 3.0 WGAG compliant, XHTML compliant, CSS 2 compliant and be Gender Neutral compliant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millar Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 Erm, What the heck is WGAG compliancy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 Dunno, ask Matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest IAIHMB Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 I believe he meant WCAG compliant, where WCAG stands for web content accessibility guidelines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 that's the way to go :thumbsup:I dunno about the gender neutrality though, but he might have meant that as a joke, right? :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millar Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 I believe he meant WCAG compliant, where WCAG stands for web content accessibility guidelines.How can you check if a page is WCAG compliant? any tools like the validator for XHTML?About the gender, well he might be talking about the sexist language topic in this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest IAIHMB Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 How can you check if a page is WCAG compliant? any tools like the validator for XHTML?Sort of, but many question the accuracy of such tests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 While I strived to make IPB 2.2 compliant (and all pages I was able to hack around to even let a bot visit validated perfectly with my last test) this is not as much a priority as certain other things we're working on - especially given that we said we weren't redoing the skin till 3.x anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Phantom Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 While I strived to make IPB 2.2 compliant (and all pages I was able to hack around to even let a bot visit validated perfectly with my last test) this is not as much a priority as certain other things we're working on - especially given that we said we weren't redoing the skin till 3.x anyways. Good to hear, your sticking to your plan :-) Thats not without saying, if you can make simple changes to the default skin or make some code faster or better I wouldn't be against it, but thats just for a possible drool factor :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.