Adriano Faria Posted November 16 Posted November 16 Could you show the reason directly instead of the response ID in the Spam Defense logs? Thank you.
Jim M Posted November 16 Posted November 16 While I get the response ID is not really human legible, it is an always valid identification of the response. The "action" you are suggesting the change to, could change over time and seeing a response in the log that could be varying could get confusing and could hinder troubleshooting. Afterall too, we use it in the configuration screen as well, so it makes sense to relate it back that way. I wouldn't be opposed to the response ID and action taken being shown here. As that way the evergreen ID is shown, and the historical action is logged.
Adriano Faria Posted November 16 Author Posted November 16 (edited) 2 hours ago, Jim M said: The "action" you are suggesting the change to, could change over time and seeing a response in the log that could be varying could get confusing and could hinder troubleshooting. If you change the “action” description, the ID will remain the same, so the confusion will take place the same way, as I would have used X and now it is Y. Just saying… Edited November 16 by Adriano Faria
Marc Posted November 18 Posted November 18 I think, if anything, adding both may be a valid suggestion. But swapping one for the other, would simply cause more confusion. At present, if you look at the log, you can say "It returned level 4". And that is true no matter what. If you switch it to show what action was taken, there is no way to know what was actually returned. Whereas this way, you can at least go to see what action you take at that level. Sure it could have been changed, but you also have a log of that too.
Recommended Posts