LiquidFractal Posted June 14, 2016 Posted June 14, 2016 A pretty straightforward question: any way to say when the IPB suite will enable Pages searchability? I understand it's in the works, although I have yet to hear anything more about it. I know this is generally desired by many and has been mentioned by other people (but for some strange reason they posted on it in the Client Lounge instead of here):
opentype Posted June 14, 2016 Posted June 14, 2016 Just to clarify: The app “Pages” isn’t excluded from search. What isn’t included is certain widgets with text you can put on a “Pages page” and additional fields other than _title and _content you can add to a Pages database.
LiquidFractal Posted June 14, 2016 Author Posted June 14, 2016 2 hours ago, opentype said: Just to clarify: The app “Pages” isn’t excluded from search. What isn’t included is certain widgets with text you can put on a “Pages page” and additional fields other than _title and _content you can add to a Pages database. Yes, but it seems that manually-coded pages created with the Pages app are not included in Search either.
Flitterkill Posted June 14, 2016 Posted June 14, 2016 I asked a few months back, asking as a stop gap if anything else to just auto dump the additional (not title or content) fields into the index to make stuff at least findable. It is after all a single search pile for each content item so the end result would be we get what we want (just not filterable). Response was this is getting looked at so I imagine we'll get something here when they make the next sweep of Pages in their dev cycle. You're right on manual pages liquidfractal so that is probably part of what they are looking to do. IPS tends to take some time to mull the larger problem before enacting solutions rather than just stop-gap things (my dump the text in solution) so that too is probably going to be accounted for,
LiquidFractal Posted June 15, 2016 Author Posted June 15, 2016 11 hours ago, Flitterkill said: IPS tends to take some time to mull the larger problem before enacting solutions rather than just stop-gap things Well, all things considered I'd prefer they do it this way anyway so I'm ok with waiting to see what they come up with .
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.