Lee69 Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 What's the server performance like compared to IPB 2.3 series? I'm curious because there's a lot of AJAX and Javascript functions present in the new board, and was wondering if administrators are going to see a larger increase in cpu/memory usage when upgrading to 3.0? Thanks for the insight. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 FYI, javascript and AJAX execute in the user's browser, not on the server (well, with AJAX the script that the browser is calling is obviously executed), so you don't generally see server resource increases from such functionality. That said, IPB 3.0 is likely going to be a little heavier than 2.x, mainly because there's so much new functionality and much more abstracted code. You will definitely see an increased load at first if your site is open, as spiders are following new urls and reindexing content and so forth. It should level out pretty well over time, however. On the whole, after the optimizations we've done to 3.0, I think things are running about the same for 3.x compared to 2.x here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee69 Posted May 29, 2009 Author Share Posted May 29, 2009 [quote name='bfarber' date='29 May 2009 - 02:14 PM' timestamp='1243602899' post='1806127'] FYI, javascript and AJAX execute in the user's browser, not on the server (well, with AJAX the script that the browser is calling is obviously executed), so you don't generally see server resource increases from such functionality. That said, IPB 3.0 is likely going to be a little heavier than 2.x, mainly because there's so much new functionality and much more abstracted code. You will definitely see an increased load at first if your site is open, as spiders are following new urls and reindexing content and so forth. It should level out pretty well over time, however. On the whole, after the optimizations we've done to 3.0, I think things are running about the same for 3.x compared to 2.x here. Thanks for the post bfarber. That eliminates my worries. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Now, as of late our database backups have decided to start running early in the morning here (EST). I'm hopeful one of our server admins takes care of that soon. :whistle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.