Are lighttpd and xcache (like eaccelerator?) faster then apache 2.2 and eaccelertator?

I've never seen any benchmarks regarding it. Search and see if you come across anything, if you do let me know -- would be interesting.

I've never seen any benchmarks regarding it. Search and see if you come across anything, if you do let me know -- would be interesting.

I found on their site its usually faster at php & faster at normal downloads/directory listing.

.Logan if you could - could you set it up on my server?

.Logan if you could - could you set it up on my server?

I've contacted you via PM.

I couldnt get Lighttpd installed - nor can I pay you sorry.

dont know about accelators but YES lighty dose run ipb better then apache.

on my setuo we used apache for years, then 2 months ago switch to lighty load av dropped from a horrid 5.x (constantly) to a much more manageable 1.x. and occationally in the first few days to test this we regularry switched between the 2 and the exact same thing happened :-)

Yes - running lighty and xcache its running alot faster even without xcache enabled as a api

Any working example of this light httpd