So one more thing while I have your attention, I am actually doing something backwards in process.
I am having a "advertiser" or in my scenario a person who needs something done. They are willing to pay $X.xx. A person willing to do the work says, "I need more" and bids up the price to $XX.xx. In this case 2 more show up, etc. So everything was working fantastic until I realized that if/when the person says "buy now", the transaction is on the person willing to do the work. OOops, I'm not paying myself to do your work.ðąðĪŠ ð Me when I realized this during a test.
So did I lay that out right? I am right now thinking of a work around like educating the "advertiser" they will need to buy their own product. Seems an easy add?
The set to complete function is Perfect, because I can easily "assign" the work to a member. This is sooooooo f'n cool. I hope I am not throwing ideas around!
Any way, Let's talk about it.ðĪð§ââïļ
Ok. I see now, this is about the actual ad. I was thinking something different. It didn't trigger because of a problem. Just didn't understand the wording?
Just started with it and I have already found 1 2 for my list.