Jump to content

Quote & Code Style Suggestion


Guest MasumX

Recommended Posts

--I think it's time to change the coding and quoting style no? It needs a new style & improvements.
-Also ability to select quoted & coded text in one simple click. It's annoying to me that I have to select all the text by highlighting them with mouse.

As you can see there is a <select> link, which you can click to select the coded & quoted area :)
untitled2il6.jpg

I think, this should have been a feature of IPB 2.2!

Here are some suggestion, I also made about IPB 2.2 ( But were too late, since IPB 2.2 is already feature locked down) so I guess they apply for IPB 3.0?

http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?showtopic=227901



Maybe mod can move the topic here? or should I start another topic for them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And so how much time does it take you guys to highlight a block of text or code you want to copy for quote/code tags? It doesn't take me very long, maybe I'm just really good at it... :unsure:


True, but the other consideration is when you ask users to copy text there's always someone out there who'll miss copying one or two critical characters and swear they did it right, lol.

Your mods and especially your Universal Mod Installer are excellent because of all the care you take to help the person get it installed right. Anyway, I do agree with you that there's not much time involved in copying text manually! :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And so how much time does it take you guys to highlight a block of text or code you want to copy for quote/code tags?

It doesn't take me very long, maybe I'm just really good at it...

:unsure:



Could be true but if you insert a huge js or php code? how long do you think it would take? let me give you a example...select this quoted area for me......


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST


TESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST




now which would be much easier? one click or highlighting it with ur mouse?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's like comparing which is easier, picking up a piece of paper or picking up a stapler. Sure, picking up a piece of paper is easy because it's much lighter, but a stapler's not exactly heavy; picking it up is pretty darn easy too.



HaHa. good example ^^...it's indeed "pretty darn easy"

But it's not only a stapler here, it's a lot of quoted text "one word of coded text" of course would be "pretty darn easy" to select BUT if you had MANY staplers and MANY papers would it still be "pretty darn easy" to pick em up? no! but if you were able to pick many at once would you not do it? hell yeah!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the option (small buttons) to enlarge or delarge (make it smaller) the quote/code/codebox/what ever other boxes you can put into a post.




I also have a additional suggestion to mine above. Being able to select what you want with a (tiny button?) near 'select', when clicked a little box out to the side pops up & you can type what you want highlighted.




It's very strange (but probably very good) that I can think of somethings on the spot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, well you can't select the text in a div (regular Problems:- I don't think you can make textboxes 100% width, so it looks funny.- HTML <br>s show up when changing back to a div, I can fix this with a regular expression.Now it seems to work fairly okay, but you can't replace the code box can you? If not I wont work with it anymore...I can make this work fine for the codebox, thats like a one line edit. :P

) so what I did with javascript is change it into a textbox and select all. When unselected it changes back to a div








Link to comment
Share on other sites

HaHa. good example ^^...it's indeed "pretty darn easy"



But it's not only a stapler here, it's a lot of quoted text "one word of coded text" of course would be "pretty darn easy" to select BUT if you had MANY staplers and MANY papers would it still be "pretty darn easy" to pick em up? no! but if you were able to pick many at once would you not do it? hell yeah!


I did try to select all that sample text you had, it was a piece of cake, took me no longer than a second. To me, a great big block of text like this still is comparable to the 'stapler' in my analogy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did try to select all that sample text you had, it was a piece of cake, took me no longer than a second. To me, a great big block of text like this still is comparable to the 'stapler' in my analogy.



Who cares, have IPB open up all the tags and let people edit them all. :P I personally don't get the hook on this one, but I enjoy making BBCodes, they're easy and look nice... and there is a demand for it. :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did try to select all that sample text you had, it was a piece of cake, took me no longer than a second. To me, a great big block of text like this still is comparable to the 'stapler' in my analogy.



Sorry, but it must've taken you more than a sec. Don't believe that and it was a small sample but the quoted text could've been much much bigger. Anyways, you might be fast at selecting but everyone is not same as you (you can't justify everything based on your skills). You're referring to a "stapler" not "many" staplers. You see the difference? enough ranting, but I can assure you that if they were to integrate this feature in IPB many people would use this then using the highlight method. why? because it's easier, takes less time, and less hustle and what kewlceo said. This won't come in handy when they need to select a portion of quoted area. But it sure will come in handy when selecting a huge quoted or coded area for a fact.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This won't come in handy when they need to select a portion of quoted area.



and enters my suggestion: Being able to select what you want with a (tiny button?) near 'select', when clicked a little box out to the side pops up & you can type what you want highlighted.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...