Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications Matt November 11, 2024Nov 11
Posted July 22, 200915 yr Compare to IPB, the http://getsatisfaction.com/ is more quickly and friendly, Go ahead , IPB.
July 22, 200915 yr Author More features and good interface, and it's IE 6 compatibility.More features and good interface, and it's IE 6 compatibility.
July 22, 200915 yr Community Expert Management The words "Future" and "IE6" are at odds with each other. I am aware of the service and while it's great for off-the-cuff discussion it's not really designed as a fully feature forum. It's too basic in terms of moderation and managing discussions.
July 22, 200915 yr Author [quote name='Matt' date='22 July 2009 - 05:40 PM' timestamp='1248255603' post='1830646'] The words "Future" and "IE6" are at odds with each other. I means the old browser also can enjoy the modern interface :thumbsup: , But in IPB 3, we must change, and lose speed.
July 22, 200915 yr [quote name='.Wolfie' date='22 July 2009 - 10:39 AM' timestamp='1248255599' post='1830645'] I looked. I'm not satisfied. Aye, me neither, nor impressed. Looks like a pretty low end operation, I'll trust my site to IPB thanks. :rolleyes: If you skim the forums here there are just as many "satisfied" customer comments, looks to me like on that site they've swept their dirt under the carpet to give the illusion of total satisfaction. At least the blokes at IPB are willing to face their complainants head on and try to render assistance anyway, even when some folks have been rather rude about it! Apples and lemons I think, just no comparing them. ;)
July 23, 200915 yr This is just another thread about how IE6 isn't supported. But there is a solution to that problem, and that is... Problem solved. Stop using IE6.
July 23, 200915 yr If there's anyone still using IE6 (presently 12 or 13 percent of my visitors), I don't really want them on my site any way. Stupid people p!$$ me off.
July 23, 200915 yr It's not even in the same market, and I am not willing to pay 279 dollars a month or even pay 899 dollars a month to have "better" SEO options.
July 24, 200915 yr [quote name='Klisis' date='23 July 2009 - 08:47 PM' timestamp='1248378479' post='1831914'] It's not even in the same market, and I am not willing to pay 279 dollars a month or even pay 899 dollars a month to have "better" SEO options. That pretty much sums it up. And I really had no idea what I was looking at for a while.
July 24, 200915 yr [quote name='JÏ…ra' date='23 July 2009 - 08:55 PM' timestamp='1248396934' post='1832145'] That pretty much sums it up. And I really had no idea what I was looking at for a while. Whew, I thought I was the only one looking at it like, "WTF are they offering here?"
July 25, 200915 yr Why should new technology be held back by old technology? IE 6 users have had three years to upgrade. I'm not sure why people continue to use such a featureless, insecure browser. Can someone explain it to me?
July 25, 200915 yr No satisfaction for me either. Re IE6. Tell your members to upgrade or use Firefox. 3DKiwi
July 25, 200915 yr [quote name='Keiichi Morisato' date='24 July 2009 - 11:29 PM' timestamp='1248492560' post='1832843'] I'm not impressed either. That site should be called gotnosatisfaction.com How about "icantgetnosatisfaction.com"? :lol: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulVDM0a49Lw
July 25, 200915 yr [quote name='Keiichi Morisato' date='24 July 2009 - 11:29 PM' timestamp='1248492560' post='1832843'] I'm not impressed either. That site should be called gotnosatisfaction.com They have medicine that is suppose to spice that up for you so you do get satisfied. :whistle:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.