Will there be a GDK for 2.2? There is already a great one (and I mean great) for 2.0, but it is missing some of the recent images, and all of the skin_acp images.

Will there be a GDK for 2.2? There is already a great one (and I mean great) for 2.0, but it is missing some of the recent images, and all of the skin_acp images.

Will there be one for 2.1? :lol:

Will there be one for 2.1? :lol:

Wouldn't be much point now :ermm: .

Wouldn't be much point now :ermm: .

Why not? Everyone will upgrade? :huh:

Anyway, my actual point was "don't hold your breath" since they never got around to a 2.1 GDK.

Why not? Everyone will upgrade? :huh:

Anyway, my actual point was "don't hold your breath" since they never got around to a 2.1 GDK.

:thumbsup:

A GDK for 2.2 would be best - 2.1 is going to be out of date soon. That said it isn't an urgent priority - I'd much rather they worked on getting the next version released. :)

A GDK for 2.2 would be best -

2.1 is going to be out of date soon.

Yes, because all new major upgrades work perfectly out of the gate, lol. Do you realize it took almost a year for 2.1.x to attain "bulletproof" status? Out of date. Bah.

Yes, because all new major upgrades work perfectly out of the gate, lol. Do you realize it took almost a year for 2.1.x to attain "bulletproof" status? Out of date. Bah.

Yes, but a 2.1 GDK wouldn't help anyone. 2.2 would be more bulletproof than 2.1 anyway. With regards to errors and bugs, a GDK can't really contain them except for spellings, etc. Most of the graphics will be the same anyway between 2.1 and 2.2.

Yes, but a 2.1 GDK wouldn't help anyone. 2.2 would be more bulletproof than 2.1 anyway. With regards to errors and bugs, a GDK can't really contain them except for spellings, etc. Most of the graphics will be the same anyway between 2.1 and 2.2.

Jesus. I never "pushed" for the 2.1 GDK (it would be pointless to me since I fingured it out the hard way). I'm just saying it's not realistic to expect it so soon.

Where do you get "2.2 would be more bulletproof than 2.1 anyway"? If you add more features, you add more bugs. If 2.2 releases as a final and no point releases thereafter, I'll eat my hat with salt and pepper. :lol:

Where do you get "2.2 would be more bulletproof than 2.1 anyway"?

What he's saying is that 2.2 is going to be much more secure than that of 2.1 (as indicated by several IPS Beta Testers through various topics on 2.2 Speculation both here and at IPSB).

We'll see. ;)

For the GDK, are you wanting something using the source of the default IPB images, for recolors and extra buttons?

Or just something that has all the images in so you can quickly replace them with your own?

Well, they might make us wait until IPB 3 since they are going on about the major skin reworks v3 will bring.

But I think one for 2.2 would be a good idea.

@kewlceo, my guess is, if they brought out one for 2.2, you would be able to use it for 2.1, chances are there wont be many changes to graphics except for added images.

It's true though that the 2.0 GDK needs bringing upto date with all the various buttons added, but I agree, it probably won't get done til 3.0

@kewlceo, my guess is, if they brought out one for 2.2, you would be able to use it for 2.1, chances are there wont be many changes to graphics except for added images.

Thanks Sam. I'm covered for 2.1 but was just being a smartass. :lol:

Actually, to be perfectly honest, I would be contempt with just everything in the default style_images in 2.0 being put in.

My point is that someone has to have the PSDs (that someone being whoever creates the default skin) so why can't they share!?

For the GDK, are you wanting something using the source of the default IPB images, for recolors and extra buttons?

Or just something that has all the images in so you can quickly replace them with your own?

The defaults in PSD formats for editting text/colours, like the current 2.0 GDK

Actually, to be perfectly honest, I would be

contempt

with just everything in the default style_images in 2.0 being put in.

I think you meant content, not contempt. :lol:

Yes, thanks for that