PanSevence

Since you made it, I have to make it too, let's do this!

Maybe it's worth adding some kind of label to indicate which versions the update applies to, for example through tags.

The most important thing is that self-hosting remains available, even in a limited form, because there is no better software on the market that allows you to create such beautiful websites so easily using the themes editor.

It's clearly stated that it only applies to certain cloud packages.

Interesting, can more information about this be obtained? How will they be recommended?

Is Beta 2 planned?

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web_apps/Tutorials/js13kGames/Offline_Service_workers I'd like to suggest implementing a Service Worker to improve user experience when the server is temporarily unavailable (e.g. due to maintenance or unexpected issues). Currently, when the server returns error statuses like 503 (Service Unavailable) or 502 (Bad Gateway), users are faced with a default browser error message, which is not informative and lacks branding. We can use a Service Worker to intercept network requests and serve a custom "Offline" or "Maintenance" page when these types of errors occur.

@Adlago 66 is very good performance

@Matt When will we receive the stable version?

I'm impressed by how quickly new versions are released. I feel like the software gets significantly better with each update. Thank you. 🙏

This is a BETA version, why are you updating the production site? That's irresponsible!

https://invisioncommunity.com/forums/topic/482460-problem-with-reactions/

Is this something you are working on in version 5.0.5? @Marc @Matt

Apparently, it was released on Monday, but there was no official announcement.

Is version 5.0.4 already a stable release? I had the impression that there was no information about the release being issued, but according to the information, it took place on Monday.

Delays while typing are still present

So, we are waiting for @Matt Finger

How can I translate this list?

I didnt read the main post I just checked the changelog right away, and thats why my post turned out this way, i couldnt edit it.

Why was beta 11 released so quickly? Many critical bugs in the bug reports section have not yet been resolved.

No, there’s no dedicated application for this, nor official support for larger files. I don’t understand what the problem is with updating this field to a larger data type, seriously. @Matt @Marc

Unfortunately, nothing has changed in this regard in either version, and we still have this limitation due to the field size constraint in the table.

I don’t understand this limitation some people need to upload attachments larger than 2GB. A 10GB or even 20GB limit would be much more reasonable. It’s also misleading because setting “no limit” in the ACP still actually enforces a limit due to the table constraints. While it’s understandable that there will always be some limit, this one is particularly small. There should be clear information stating the maximum allowed size. Maybe the team will comment on this, but considering Beta 10 is one of the last releases before the stable version, I doubt anything will change before the final release. I reported this issue months ago for IC4, and they’ve released many maintenance updates since then, but I never saw any fixes addressing this problem.

I remember trying to do this in IC4 I changed the value of that field, but I ended up getting a critical database error in the ACP under the support tab. I mentioned this before, hoping it would be updated in subsequent maintenance releases, but I see that nothing has changed in this regard for IC4. The worse news is that IC5 still has this limit. I don’t want to tamper with the table fields again because I’ll just end up with another critical error.