Jump to content

Fosters

Clients
  • Posts

    2,206
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    29

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Projects

Release Notes v5

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Fosters

  1. That’s a great idea . I guess it shouldn’t be too hard to strip out the quotes before this app counts the content but I can’t promise it yet and we’re really really busy with other stuff so we’ll not be able to test this idea before October . But it’s really really an amazing idea and I’ve put it high priority on my list.. Remove quotes, emojis, attachments and count only the remaining chars
  2. Well, we have polls, but no auto promotion based on the result, but I like this idea, I've noted it into our internal suggestion tracker
  3. thanks for the report, I'll try to address the critical issues this weekend.
  4. Why couldn't you just set up 3 rules: 1. rule after 30 days: Hey, we miss you 2. rule after 60 days: Hey, not sure if you missed the first email which we sent you 30 days ago,.. get back to us.. If you don't get back in the next 30 days we'll delete your account. 3. rule after 90 days: account deletion. And to avoid any issues, I would probably create rule 1 today, rule 2 in 29 days and rule 3 ( deletion ) in 90 days.
  5. No. If the rule is 30 days, they'll get an email if they weren't online for 30 or more days but not again after another 30 days timeframe. Just to clarify how this application works: Each rule initializes a background task which iterates over all members which haven't logged in for X days (based on the rule), then it checks if the email was sent already, if not, it sends the email and logs that the email was sent, so they'll never get the same email more then once.
  6. Yea, that's the problem;) Somebody who was inactive for 3 year, was also inactive for 30 days, so all rules would apply here and all emails would be sent out and I can't think of any solution how this could be changed. I guess I could add some further logic here, where one would have to setup rules dependencies.. Something like: Rule 1: 7 days Rule2: 30 days Rule4: 3 years. Then you could configure rule 1 to ONLY be triggered if rule2 or rule 4 doesn't apply to this member. Rule 2 should only be triggered if Rule 1 was run and rule 4 NOT. Any better idea?:)
  7. What rule/criteria are you using at the moment to send the email?
  8. Sorry, the screenshots are outdate, this was replaced with the button containing "Continue reading.." ( language string limitedemailcontenta_continue_reading )
  9. I see. This scenario hasn't come up till yet:D , yea this "should" work. Guests can submit the form if you want, but we really hadn't this in mind, so some features could be buggy.... If you purchase the app and use it this way, I'll ensure this weekend that it works without any issues with guest submitted applications 🙂
  10. Could you please share a screenshot ( here or PM ) to see what you mean?
  11. Well, they could, but they wouldn't have any benefits of it... A guest member couldn't be moved to another group, a guest member couldn't get a PM or email.
  12. Hi, the reports are in an own section in the ModCP and not under the default reported content section. Please review your Moderator permissions, if you don't see it.
  13. Hello, you have to install it in your ACP on the applications page .
  14. Could you clarify what you mean? Everybody can see all the profiles.
  15. Unfortunately that’s not possible with this app
  16. A new version was released. Changehistory: Removed unnecessary debug logging code
  17. Yes, that's what the new setting is for . You'll just have to set the application and email template key
  18. Because you'll be created a new IP. Pages record for all your new content which you're going to import from your own community into pages. This sounds really like a very bad idea and it should be much easier to include support for the other stuff into Super Blocks
  19. All issues from @steadyoptions were resolved ?
  20. Thanks, the first issue is fixed for the next release (I'll release a bugfix release this weekend) . Could I please get ACP access to take a look at the second issue?
  21. This sounds like a horrible idea IMO, but yes, it should work.
  22. Thanks, I have posted this in our internal tracker, we'll see if we can improve this.
  23. And fixed. The application wasn't enabled:)
  24. I see. It seems that IPS4.3 runs this tests only for the content, but not the title. I'll see if I can improve this.
×
×
  • Create New...