Robulosity2 Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 Just a quick request/recommendation since this doesn't seem to be in place in 3.1.4 When you currently go to Ban Filters if you have a large amount of banned IPs, User Names, Email Addresses it throws them all on one page. It would be nice if this would be treated like the general members filter where if it exceeds x number of rows it would put them on multiple pages
Connor T Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 Yes yes and yes. Maybe an optional description field? I'm wondering why I banned some of these IPs 3 years ago?
Robulosity2 Posted April 14, 2011 Author Posted April 14, 2011 The description field would be nice.. if your banning a spam member (View Spam members > Bulk select > Ban IP & Email for example) it would be nice to auto-populate this to "SPAMSERVICE_FLAGGED" Which brings me to a mini second comment If your marking multiple users as spam, the API is taking a very long time to actually return a response from the IPS servers
Aisha Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 Because of the stop forum spam hook my ban list has also gotten incredibly long. I think pages might be an issue though since they put 3 separate sections on one view. And also what if you're trying to find an ip address to unban one day? They'd have to add a search mechanism as well...
Robulosity2 Posted April 15, 2011 Author Posted April 15, 2011 Because of the stop forum spam hook my ban list has also gotten incredibly long. I think pages might be an issue though since they put 3 separate sections on one view. And also what if you're trying to find an ip address to unban one day? They'd have to add a search mechanism as well... Um, there already is a search option on IP Members > Manage Members > Search Where Members IP (Contains|Equals)
Aisha Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 I mean like if I want to remove it from the ban list for some reason. And therere better ip search tools. Like member management and ip lookup for mods. ;)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.