Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications By Matt November 11, 2024
L3ron Posted April 7, 2010 Posted April 7, 2010 Hello everybody, after one hour watching for a post which referrs to the problem, I started a new one. If ther is already one which gives a clear answer, please redirect me ;) The problem: In the forum there are many emoticons (about 250) and my quest is now if ther is the possibility, by mod or build in with IPB, to have special drop-down-menus for special emoticon groups. Those menus should be shown in the emoticon sidebar in the full reply editor. My imagination: The standard side-bar should contain the standard emoticons. If you now click on "Show All", a menu with the groups will be shown. e.g.: If you now click on "Smilies", all emoticon, which were atteched to the group "Smilies" are shown [optional without the "'tags"]. Is this possible? L3ron [*]Smilies [*]Symbols (Of the program the forums are dealing with) [*]Objets (pizza, coins, coffee-cups etc.) [*]etc.
L3ron Posted April 7, 2010 Author Posted April 7, 2010 This is not a built in feature. Mh, okay... But is there any MOD or something like this, which can handle this? Or is there the possibility, that a pop-up will be open in which every emoticon will be shown?
InvisionNutCase Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 I have asked about this before in other posts... and have not had a real answer re: this... the emoticons either show up in a 1 x array (name and image) or 2 x array with two images per row with the full editor.. if a site has a lot of smiley's then the list is long and not easy to navigatge... will 3.1 or a future mod fix this so that we can choose the array size??? i will post the results in my other requests once this is updated..
bfarber Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Improving the emoticons management and handling is something we'd like to do, but won't be in 3.1. I can't say when it will be done.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.