Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications By Matt November 11, 2024
evgen Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 First of all, many thank for fast help with some problems to IPS support team!New 2.2 surprised by very easy setup proccess and a lot of new functions, thanks Ips developers!But I think that new most important thing called "member's rating" hasn't got good support.I mean that there is not a few interesting features and many users must use modifications of forum because:Rating invisible in post view(only by clicking on username)New user rating system isn't have setting like a style of show (text, graphics or all this), haven't message of reputation (why this user have 5 stars or 1)haven't list of users who rated memberand may be very nice to control a forum/category permissions by reputation, or simply promote group by high rating.all this doing member's rating unfortunately, non-finished function imho.Please dont read this message like a very critical, ipb2.2 is extremely cool engine, but member's rating system could be upgraded and reworked I think. Best regards, evgenThanks again, I'm sorry for english
TestingSomething Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 Yeah i agree it would be nice in topic view and also just like with a lot of rating systems, it is kind of ambiguous as far as what is being rated. it could be the member as a person, member as a poster, or member's profile. I would personally assume it is for rating the member as far as their contributions to the community.
evgen Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 Rating in many communities are very important thing, please make it nice!
evgen Posted February 1, 2007 Posted February 1, 2007 Please, people, support this idea! :)I dont want to use mods because this feature already in forum, but not finished and reinstall mods with every new version of ipb isn't simple.For many communities rating for users is very usefull option.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.