cmanns Posted October 28, 2006 Posted October 28, 2006 Are lighttpd and xcache (like eaccelerator?) faster then apache 2.2 and eaccelertator?
Logan Posted October 28, 2006 Posted October 28, 2006 I've never seen any benchmarks regarding it. Search and see if you come across anything, if you do let me know -- would be interesting.
cmanns Posted October 28, 2006 Posted October 28, 2006 I've never seen any benchmarks regarding it. Search and see if you come across anything, if you do let me know -- would be interesting.I found on their site its usually faster at php & faster at normal downloads/directory listing. .Logan if you could - could you set it up on my server?
Logan Posted October 28, 2006 Posted October 28, 2006 .Logan if you could - could you set it up on my server?I've contacted you via PM.
cmanns Posted October 29, 2006 Posted October 29, 2006 I couldnt get Lighttpd installed - nor can I pay you sorry.
beeman Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 dont know about accelators but YES lighty dose run ipb better then apache.on my setuo we used apache for years, then 2 months ago switch to lighty load av dropped from a horrid 5.x (constantly) to a much more manageable 1.x. and occationally in the first few days to test this we regularry switched between the 2 and the exact same thing happened :-)
cmanns Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 Yes - running lighty and xcache its running alot faster even without xcache enabled as a api
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.