If a user has content moderation enabled, any new topics or posts need to be approved by a moderator, and any edits to existing non-topic-startong posts. However, editing the topic's original post does not need to be approved.

Especially when used to combat spam, this is a pretty big loophole.

To reproduce:

* Enable content moderation for a user

* Have that user post a new topic - moderator approval will be required

* Have a moderator approve the topic

* Have the user go back and edit that post - moderator approval will incorrectly not be required

 

Have the user go back and edit that post - moderator approval will incorrectly not be required

If you use Member Groups to put members in content moderation, then you should also be able to edit that groups time limit for editing posts. For example, my moderated users as well as my unmoderated users have a 10 minute window to edit whatever they want. But when times up, their post is mine, lol 😄

 

If you use Member Groups to put members in content moderation, then you should also be able to edit that groups time limit for editing posts. For example, my moderated users as well as my unmoderated users have a 10 minute window to edit whatever they want. But when times up, their post is mine, lol 😄

I shouldn't need to do that though, it works for posts within a topic.

This is correct at the present time. If a post is already approved, and the user has the ability to edit, they would indeed be able to edit that without moderation

 

This is correct at the present time. If a post is already approved, and the user has the ability to edit, they would indeed be able to edit that without moderation

That's not true today for replies (they get requeued for approval), only new topics. It also defeats the point of content moderation if they can post something ok and later make it bad.

Edited December 12, 20231 yr by Colonel_mortis

Yeah, I think we can stick in a bug report for this. It does make a pretty big loophole for spammers and bad actors.

This reminds me of another annoying issue while you are poking around in that area - this is what someone sees if content moderation is enabled on an account after they have replied to a topic:

If the content must be approved before the content can be edited then an edit link shouldn't be there, and I shouldn't be able to edit (which I can if I click the link)

 

 

This reminds me of another annoying issue while you are poking around in that area - this is what someone sees if content moderation is enabled on an account after they have replied to a topic:

If the content must be approved before the content can be edited then an edit link shouldn't be there, and I shouldn't be able to edit (which I can if I click the link)

 

Will add it to the bug report. Thank you

 

This reminds me of another annoying issue while you are poking around in that area - this is what someone sees if content moderation is enabled on an account after they have replied to a topic:

If the content must be approved before the content can be edited then an edit link shouldn't be there, and I shouldn't be able to edit (which I can if I click the link)

 

I disagree.

I have users under content moderation who will submit a post, and then want to go in and correct spelling errors or add an extra thought while their 15 minute edit window is still open. When the 15 minute edit window has closed, then that Edit link should disappear.

 

Will add it to the bug report. Thank you

Please reconsider. I don't see this as a bug, but as the way it should work and should continue working.

 

I disagree.

In that case, the bug would be the language string being incorrect.

Anyway - it's reported, up to Invision how they handle it.

Edited December 12, 20231 yr by Nathan Explosion

 

In that case, the bug would be the language string being incorrect.

Ah, I see that first red arrow now. Yes, it should read "This content is currently pending approval"