Jump to content

The worst thing about 3.2

Featured Replies

Posted

Yes. I've tried to ignore it. But, I'm weird.

u mean the light color change from the background and the logo right?

I thought that was intentional.

If that's the worse thing in IPB 3.2 then you know that IPB did one hell of a job. :P

Yeah, that indeed is a PITA. I'm sure Rikki will be onto it though. ;)

  • Author
 

u mean the light color change from the background and the logo right?




Yes! Where the left gradient of the logo image does not blend into the header background, like the right side does.

 

If that's the worse thing in IPB 3.2 then you know that IPB did one hell of a job. :tongue:




IPB 3.2 is a great achievement no doubt. I just have issues :frantics:

Nice catch.
I'm sure the IPS team is cracking down on the case now. ;) They want it PERFECT.

 


The worst thing about 3.2





The fact that it is not available yet :baby:

bug report was aready posted by bfarber i think

I need to change my glasses...spacsavers, here I come!

The other end isn't clean either.

THAT is the worse for you????...Wow, I can barely see the difference.

Personally, I have trouble digesting the aesthetics of the title bar at the top.
I'm sure this can be easily modified though, but I wish it looked a little more like this:

post-115527-0-35820100-1307145715_thumb.

And also, I wish adding items to menus wasn't so complicated (you normally need a mod for it).
If you've got several add-ons to your forums, you know what I'm talking about (when all the menu items do not fit in, it doesn't look too good...)

  • Management

I posted a bug report about that earlier :)

You make a strong point

wow, I didn't even notice. Now that I do, I can't take my eyes of it! :logik:

 

wow, I didn't even notice. Now that I do, I can't take my eyes of it! :logik:




You're right. I don't think I'll be able to sleep properly until this is fixed
 

Personally, I have trouble digesting the aesthetics of the title bar at the top.


I'm sure this can be easily modified though, but I wish it looked a little more like this:





And also, I wish adding items to menus wasn't so complicated (you normally need a mod for it).


If you've got several add-ons to your forums, you know what I'm talking about (when all the menu items do not fit in, it doesn't look too good...)




Adding a link is as simple as adding one line of code..... not sure why you need a mod for that?

Adding one or 2 is fine, but say you add... 5 or more. The width of the bar is not long enough and it messes up the whole menu. That's why things like "Fusion menu" were created.

 

Adding one or 2 is fine, but say you add... 5 or more. The width of the bar is not long enough and it messes up the whole menu. That's why things like "Fusion menu" were created.



It was kind of a mess in 3.1, but it's actually not too bad in 3.2:
%7Boption%7D

That's definitely better than 3.1, yes. :)
Although you'll have to admit that foldable menus would look better...

Plus Alex K needs a photo.

 

bug report was aready posted by bfarber i think




WHY have I heard of that screen name before? And they could always center there logo and make both sides blend. :P

It was honestly the first thing I noticed lol -_-

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.