Comablack Posted June 13, 2007 Posted June 13, 2007 According to the RFC 822:3.1.1. LONG HEADER FIELDS Each header field can be viewed as a single, logical line of ASCII characters, comprising a field-name and a field-body. For convenience, the field-body portion of this conceptual entity can be split into a multiple-line representation; this is called "folding". The general rule is that wherever there may be linear-white-space (NOT simply LWSP-chars), a CRLF immediately followed by AT LEAST one LWSP-char may instead be inserted. Thus, the single line To: "Joe & J. Harvey" <ddd @Org>, JJV @ BBN can be represented as: To: "Joe & J. Harvey" <ddd @ Org>, JJV@BBN and To: "Joe & J. Harvey" <ddd@ Org>, JJV @BBN and To: "Joe & J. Harvey" <ddd @ Org>, JJV @ BBN and 3.1.3. UNSTRUCTURED FIELD BODIES For some fields, such as "Subject" and "Comments", no struc- turing is assumed, and they are treated simply as <text>s, as in the message body. Rules of folding apply to these fields, so that such field bodies which occupy several lines must therefore have the second and successive lines indented by at least one LWSP-char. While IPB doesn't respect this rule and formats multiline long headers like: Subject: line1 line2 instead of Subject: line1 line2 (note the indent on the second line) This causes truncation of such headers as Subject (tested with QMail Toaster installation via SMTP). To correct the problem find: $value = implode($this->header_eol, $encoded_text_parts); and replace with: $value = implode($this->header_eol . ' ', $encoded_text_parts);
bfarber Posted June 13, 2007 Posted June 13, 2007 While I've never run into this myself...I'd post this in our bug tracker, as it sounds more like a bug than a feature suggestion.
Comablack Posted June 13, 2007 Posted June 13, 2007 You didn't run into this because with latin charset subject will hardly exceed 76 characters. I'm using windows-1251 charset and MIME encoded subject of about 10-20 characters exceeds this value and IPB splits it into multiple lines. Also I didn't have this problem myself with the old mail server (which was probably more tolerant to such mistakes), but with the new MTA installation I got this problem.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.