Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications By Matt November 11, 2024
Quillz Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 :D I like Gmail's text editor. IPB should borrow some features from there.When will Spell Check be available?Is spell check really necessary? It's available in IE via the IESpell plug-in, and Firefox 2.0 will have inline spell checking by default.Geeez, I have many ideas for this rich text editor. I think "auto save" would be nice. :thumbsup: This would be a nifty feature!!Auto-save would be a very nice feature, since sometimes the text editor glitches and your post isn't always submitted properly.
TCWT Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 auto save would require a "send later" folder like the one for the PM system. So, there should be an option to save posts to be sent later for topics as well.
Quillz Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 auto save would require a "send later" folder like the one for the PM system. So, there should be an option to save posts to be sent later for topics as well.Another good idea! :thumbsup:
Stec Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 One benefit of having the emoticons to the left of the text editor is the text area is more of a realistic length, to that of topic view. You get more of an idea of how many lines you've typed before leaving a break.Yes that is my biggest complaint with the width is the loss of how your post will look now. But other than that I like the new changes....I think!?
Quillz Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Yes that is my biggest complaint with the width is the loss of how your post will look now. But other than that I like the new changes....I think!?But is there a distinct advantage of knowing in advance how your post will look? And if you really need to know, that's why there is the "Preview Post" button.
Stec Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 But is there a distinct advantage of knowing in advance how your post will look? And if you really need to know, that's why there is the "Preview Post" button.Awww yes but the preview post button does not take into effect all the other stuff like an avatar and post stats and takes up the same width as the big wide whitetext field rendering the preview post kinda useless. The advantage is seeing how your paragraphs look in real time or close to it with a more normal size text field.
robirming Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 We are talking about some ideas to change up the feel :) Give us a day or two.Happy to hear! :)
Quillz Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Awww yes but the preview post button does not take into effect all the other stuff like an avatar and post stats and takes up the same width as the big wide whitetext field rendering the preview post kinda useless. The advantage is seeing how your paragraphs look in real time or close to it with a more normal size text field.Then perhaps "Preview Post" should be fixed up to display one's Avatar, etc.
Κeith Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Is spell check really necessary? It's available in IE via the IESpell plug-in, and Firefox 2.0 will have inline spell checking by default. Auto-save would be a very nice feature, since sometimes the text editor glitches and your post isn't always submitted properly.Which I've had to disable by default. You want to have some fun, let it try to auto check the advanced css textarea. >_< :lol:
Quillz Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Which I've had to disable by default. You want to have some fun, let it try to auto check the advanced css textarea. >_< :lol:I believe you are able to have it bypass text fields that you don't want it to check.
Κeith Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Yeah, but it doesn't remember across sessions, unless they've included that in a nightly since the public release of beta.
lupin84 Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 The way I see it is the point of the rich text editor is to have all your options in front of you so it makes posting a quicker and easier experience, if everything is sorted into dropdowns I may as well just type the code myself.
TestingSomething Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 :D I like Gmail's text editor. IPB should borrow some features from there.One problem with gmail is you can't even highlight text and copy/paste it in a reply. You have to use the keyboard.
Mat Barrie Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Is spell check really necessary? It's available in IE via the IESpell plug-in, and Firefox 2.0 will have inline spell checking by default.Auto-save would be a very nice feature, since sometimes the text editor glitches and your post isn't always submitted properly.I thought the new spell check DID use IESpell.
Management Matt Posted September 20, 2006 Management Posted September 20, 2006 One of the biggest complaints we had about the old editor was that it was too cluttered. We addressed this by moving some of the less used options into the drop down. The RTE is also modular - you can write your own "Insert Special..." modules and have them automatically appear in the list. This alone should appeal to modders.Also, the items that appear in the "Insert Special..." list are items that don't have a 'state'. The bold, underline, (etc) and justification options all have a 'state' so when you put your cursor in a block of text, they highlight making it easy to undo formatting. Moving them into the "Insert Special..." list would remove that function.Give it a few days to get used to it and then see how you feel. Personally, I think that it's a huge step up in terms of efficiency and definitely reduces clutter anad makes it less intimitating for day to day posting.The width can be adjusted very easily in the skin. It's set to 100% - so all you need to do is add a DIV wrapper around it and set the width there. It's only one template bit to edit. Personally, I like the width, it makes posting long posts much easier.Also, don't forget, the new editor allows you to switch between standard and RTE modes via ajax and allows you to actually edit the HTML when using the RTE.We're evaluating some options, including having emoticons on either a floating palette or to the side.
Quillz Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 One of the biggest complaints we had about the old editor was that it was too cluttered. We addressed this by moving some of the less used options into the drop down. The RTE is also modular - you can write your own "Insert Special..." modules and have them automatically appear in the list. This alone should appeal to modders.Also, the items that appear in the "Insert Special..." list are items that don't have a 'state'. The bold, underline, (etc) and justification options all have a 'state' so when you put your cursor in a block of text, they highlight making it easy to undo formatting. Moving them into the "Insert Special..." list would remove that function.Give it a few days to get used to it and then see how you feel. Personally, I think that it's a huge step up in terms of efficiency and definitely reduces clutter anad makes it less intimitating for day to day posting.The width can be adjusted very easily in the skin. It's set to 100% - so all you need to do is add a DIV wrapper around it and set the width there. It's only one template bit to edit. Personally, I like the width, it makes posting long posts much easier.Also, don't forget, the new editor allows you to switch between standard and RTE modes via ajax and allows you to actually edit the HTML when using the RTE.I agree with this. I do find the new RTE is much better, especially as it finally works with Opera, which is my browser of choice.
Management Matt Posted September 20, 2006 Management Posted September 20, 2006 I'm going to add a button or link (not sure how) that will make the smilies appear to the left like they used to. This option will be saved with a cookie so the next time you visit your RTE it'll automatically open.I think this is the best 'medium' between those who want a nice clean large uncluttered text area and those who are addicted to emoticons. :)
gel Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 I think better add an option for admin to set which style as default too.
lupin84 Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Would it be possible to have it so that we could customise what buttons are available because my boardies use the quote, image buttons all the time so all this layout has done for them is add extra clicks. It's not clutter if you use the buttons. Do people genuinely not quote or post images on other forums?? In fact link is under there too. It's just all the stuff we need taking extra steps to reach.I agree with the folk who said they can't upgrade if it remains this way. My boardies will lynch me. :( I'm gutted because I love the rest of it.
TestingSomething Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 I think your idea is great, Matt. If I understand it properly.I personally love the editor. The only thing I am disappointed in is I am sure my spoiler modification won't work in it without being modified and its author hasn't supported it in months. Hopefully I can figure out myself how to put it in again because it is necessary for my particular sites.
TestingSomething Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 And by the way, people, a lot of things I did not like at first are kind of growing on me, so it could end up being great. I do hope the friends popup becomes different, otherwise most things are fine or can be changed with skinning.
Munja Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Is anyone else having problems with the undo and redo options, redo works after an undo, but if you use it first it undos.
Management Matt Posted September 20, 2006 Management Posted September 20, 2006 You can tweak the editor as much as you like, the HTML is no longer in a javascript file and is plain HTML editable via the ACP.
lupin84 Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 So would it be a lot of work for me to be able to put it back the way it was before? (I know HTML but can't do much with PHP or anything)This post screen feels like a jumped up version of the quick reply box now. :( It would have been better if the quick reply had these dropdown options then the main post window displayed the way it used to with the full range of options.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.