Jump to content

ssslippy

Clients
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    ssslippy got a reaction from Blind Bandit in Moderation, where IPB is lacking..   
    This does not cut it, the whole ability to "soft" delete things and them staying in the forum is a HUGE thing. An unapproved post does not work for me as what happens if you are also approving posts? Your just putting posts back into the cue. This cancels the whole point of moderation. The trash is a semi good idea and being able to move a post to a forum you can not see is a great thing but as an administrator I have no clue where this post comes from.
  2. Like
    ssslippy got a reaction from Matti in How do I scale IPB to handle 25000 simultaneous users?   
    What you should run is xcache which in tests has proven faster then eaccelerate for your opcache. This will cache the php scripts into your ram. These needs to be run on every front end machine. Then you run memcache for the cache system in IPB itself. This cache can be shared across multiple servers and is designed this way, memcache can scale to any size.

    However 25,000 active users at once is quite a bit of traffic. Your talking about requiring multiple database servers at least a primary and slave server. Your front end is going to take the brunt of the work and will require good load balancing and I would recommend maximizing your server resources with xcache, memcached, and running sphinx. I would also get away from apache and switch to nginx with php-fpm. I only run a forum that caps out at 2k users but the speed difference is amazing and the server load is quite noticeable.

    Overall I think your client also needs to understand his up front costs of running at least 10-15 servers even if optimized. I personally would start with 2 front end and one database server and work from there.
  3. Like
    ssslippy got a reaction from Munnday in Introducing Spam Monitoring Service   
    I think what needs to be done is the lifetime/perpetual license holders should not have to give up their license to get this service. They should be able to retain their license while if they wish they can pay a $25/6 month fee on TOP of their current license without having to downgrade.

    The fact is license holders are being forced out of their license for a service they want and would most likely pay for if they did not have to lose their current license status. Find a way to allow someone like me who has a perpetual license to KEEP my perpetual and still pay $25/6 months and things would be fine.
  4. Like
    ssslippy got a reaction from grippo in Introducing Spam Monitoring Service   
    I think what needs to be done is the lifetime/perpetual license holders should not have to give up their license to get this service. They should be able to retain their license while if they wish they can pay a $25/6 month fee on TOP of their current license without having to downgrade.

    The fact is license holders are being forced out of their license for a service they want and would most likely pay for if they did not have to lose their current license status. Find a way to allow someone like me who has a perpetual license to KEEP my perpetual and still pay $25/6 months and things would be fine.
×
×
  • Create New...