Gabriel Torres

@Runar Another one very popular here. Mercado Livre https://produto.mercadolivre.com.br/MLB-1854616191-kit-remove-poeira-pc-note-ar-comprimido-spray-pincel-escova-_JM?matt_tool=31508429&matt_word=&matt_source=google&matt_campaign_id=14303413595&matt_ad_group_id=125984286637&matt_match_type=&matt_network=g&matt_device=c&matt_creative=539354956068&matt_keyword=&matt_ad_position=&matt_ad_type=pla&matt_merchant_id=138054060&matt_product_id=MLB1854616191&matt_product_partition_id=1457960502647&matt_target_id=aud-378637574381%3Apla-1457960502647 https://produto.mercadolivre.com.br/MLB-1743489486-gabinete-pc-gamer-2-usb-frontais-novo-modelo-cl-y75r-visutec-_JM?matt_tool=14213447&matt_word=&matt_source=bing&matt_campaign=MLB_ML_BING_AO_CE-ALL-ALL_X_PLA_ALLB_TXS_ALL&matt_campaign_id=382858295&matt_ad_group=CE&matt_match_type=e&matt_network=o&matt_device=c&matt_keyword=default Everything after the first "?" can be safely removed! Cheers

@Adriano Faria @Marc Stridgen My suggestion then is for the source code to check whether the database is set or not and add the ?d= parameter only if the database isn't set. Because the navigation URL looks ugly, we are exposing the database ID, and this may also influence SEO.

Hello, Here in our install we found the following issue. Because the source code adds the ?d= parameter in $table->baseUrl, navigation links also have this parameter. For example, for our https://www.clubedohardware.com.br/noticias/armazenamento/ page, the default navigation becomes https://www.clubedohardware.com.br/noticias/armazenamento/page/2/?d=6, https://www.clubedohardware.com.br/noticias/armazenamento/page/3/?d=6 and so on, instead of just https://www.clubedohardware.com.br/noticias/armazenamento/page/2/, https://www.clubedohardware.com.br/noticias/armazenamento/page/3/ etcetera. To fix this, I had to edit /applications/cms/modules/front/database/category.php and remove the following line: $table->baseUrl = $table->baseUrl->setQueryString( 'd', \IPS\cms\Databases\Dispatcher::i()->databaseId ); I know we have a very customized Pages configuration here, but I am giving you a heads up to check whether this line should really exist. Cheers!

@Runar See below several examples of what could be cleaned out. Amazon https://www.amazon.com.br/Placa-Vídeo-AFOX-Radeon-RX560D/dp/B099X6JXVS/ref=asc_df_B099X6JXVS/?tag=googleshopp00-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=379726213405&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=2077078744594458364&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9101337&hvtargid=pla-1395670392199&psc=1 https://www.amazon.com.br/Cooler-Gamer-Intel-LGA1156-Deepcool/dp/B00X9LBO6Q/ref=pd_sbs_2/141-4175838-4920651?pd_rd_w=lDoas&pf_rd_p=fd372a8b-e6ae-4397-bd2a-6918070dc11e&pf_rd_r=PS7R5TZY09KW1MRS05EH&pd_rd_r=0c4ee111-ec81-45de-bac5-348c313c96ae&pd_rd_wg=MoG8I&pd_rd_i=B00X9LBO6Q&psc=1 These two examples are from amazon.com.br, but amazon.com, amazon.co.uk etc use the same format. Everything after the ASIN code can be removed. The stripped-down version of the same links would be: https://www.amazon.com.br/Placa-Vídeo-AFOX-Radeon-RX560D/dp/B099X6JXVS/ https://www.amazon.com.br/Cooler-Gamer-Intel-LGA1156-Deepcool/dp/B00X9LBO6Q/ Aliexpress https://pt.aliexpress.com/item/1005003127978969.html?spm=a2g0o.9042311.0.0.39dcb90a8ouyUv https://pt.aliexpress.com/item/1005002307427655.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.271e38b0Dwvegf&algo_pvid=83fd4b4b-0dad-40e2-9bd6-7e174d90e786&algo_exp_id=83fd4b4b-0dad-40e2-9bd6-7e174d90e786-1&pdp_ext_f={"sku_id"%3A"12000020010865917"}&pdp_pi=-1%3B600.06%3B-1%3B-1%40salePrice%3BBRL%3Bsearch-mainSearch The first example was stripped-down correctly by the plugin, but not the second one. Everything after the .html can be removed. Also note that here the example if for the Portuguese version of Aliexpress, but it applies to any version of this website. Submarino https://www.submarino.com.br/produto/3151895868?opn=XMLGOOGLE https://www.submarino.com.br/produto/2299745436?epar=bp_pl_00_go_pla_pcgamer_geral_gmv&epar=bp_pl_00_go_pla_pcgamer_geral_gmv&opn=XMLGOOGLE&WT.srch=1&utm_medium=buscappc&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=marca%3Asuba%3Bmidia%3Abuscappc%3Bformato%3Apla%3Bsubformato%3A00%3Bidcampanha%3Apla_pcgamer_geral_gmv&gclid=CjwKCAiAksyNBhAPEiwAlDBeLFPNb-9LkMp9jVF_IJjPhYrmvrHrSkYYOCLuGxIh4Pra8eiRYIOfTxoCRV8QAvD_BwE Everything after the product number can be removed. Americanas.com https://www.americanas.com.br/produto/2486010275?epar=bp_pl_00_go_inf-aces_acessorios_geral_gmv&opn=YSMESP&WT.srch=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA8ICOBhDmARIsAEGI6o0gGYaX7k4U5OrIPQK-UhDSFFFmL8s6YNNS2b3vuo7V5N-T-XQSOlMaAoNMEALw_wcB&voltagem=BIVOLT#info-section Ditto. Terabyteshop https://www.terabyteshop.com.br/produto/10606/memoria-ddr4-corsair-vengeance-rgb-pro-cmw16gx4m2c3200c16-16gb-2x8gb-3200mhz?gclid=CjwKCAiAksyNBhAPEiwAlDBeLM6jxRmKBYgp4D9IAgH1ynX1xfUV98JekBpbZWq0BNWnXmsOJDTs8hoCn_EQAvD_BwE Ditto. I hope I have helped and let me know if you want more examples! 🙂

Hi, Today I noticed a weird behavior here. Images uploaded by users with the .jpeg extension (note: jpeg with an "e", not jpg) are not rendered correctly. Instead, a link is displayed as below: Here are a few links where you can see the issue live: https://www.clubedohardware.com.br/forums/topic/1581037-discos-rígidos-dando-erro-na-hora-de-formatarinstalar-windows/#comment-8335914 https://www.clubedohardware.com.br/forums/topic/1580818-reparar-fios-do-conector/#comment-8335796 https://www.clubedohardware.com.br/forums/topic/1580908-ryzen-5-3600-n-usa-mais-de-20-em-jogos/#comment-8335477 Everything is working fine for all other file types and image formats. The images are loaded correctly when we click on the links. Please advise!

@Runar I will provide you with several examples from Amazon and other online stores that are popular here in our forums. I will get back to you with those. I just need to find real examples here... hehehe

@Runar Does it cover Amazon.com affiliate links? Because one problem we have here is users "recommending" products, but the links actually have afilliate tracking info.

@Marc Stridgen Just a follow up regarding this specific report from Google (Coverage > Excluded > Blocked due to access forbidden (403)) and the changes I implemented here in my install that might be added in future versions. I added the following to our robots.txt: Disallow: /theme/ Disallow: /*/?do=markRead Disallow: /*/?do=reportComment Note that I didn't mention the /theme/ issue in my original post, but after analyzing the report, I found several /theme/?csrfKey=xxxxx links listed. I searched all templates and added rel='nofollow' to all links related to markRead and reportComment. This includes templates from Pages as well. There were several templates that I had to edit. The ?advanced_search_submitted= from my original post must be diregarded. This was caused by a link structure we had in our old, custom layout. With these changes, the number of "affected pages" dropped from 38.7k to 26.1k so far, and we hope to see this number dropping further in the next few weeks. Cheers

We are old school here -- our website is up and running since 1996, with forums implemented in 2002. I understand what @Lindy says about the times that have changed. However for us here it is important to know when a user has been banned/suspended/restricted at the front-end, because we have several moderators and in a long topic, it is simply impossible to remember who in that topic has received warnings or is banned/suspended. Therefore, a solution to display banned info at the front-end only for staff members would be very useful, while preventing issues with regular users. This is already avaliable in the user's profile page; I mean adding this info at the user's miniprofile that goes along each post.

@Marc Stridgen Thanks. Anxiously waiting for this implementation/fix... 🙂

Hi, I am testing our install's web manifest. All icons I configured have transparent background. However, the icon that is installed at my computer's desktop has white background. Ditto for the task bar. Please advise. If anyone cares to test: https://www.clubedohardware.com.br Cheers.

Thanks @opentype, excellent solution, it worked like a charm! 🙂

Hi, is there a setting to disable the bottom breadcrumb? See where I marked in red in the screenshot below. I know I can simply remove the code from globalTemplate, but as you know, the less we change templates, the better for future upgrades! 🙂

Bumping this, c'mon IPS Team! LOL Easy fix! We need this, Lighthouse fails the PWA audit: https://web.dev/maskable-icon-audit/?utm_source=lighthouse&utm_medium=lr

@SeNioR- @Stuart Silvester Decided to solve this here in our install as follows: 1. Removed from robots.txt: Disallow: /profile/ 2. Added a new SEO rule in ACP > Search Engine Optimization > Meta tags as: Page address: /profile/* meta tag name: robots content: noindex,nofollow I found out that the platform already has all the tools we need to fine-tune SEO! Just need some digging! 🙂 Cheers.

@Stuart Silvester I hope you can add this tool soon! We decided to change our website layout and now we need to redo 3,000+ thumbnails to fit correctly the new dimensions... ykes!

Hi, Two questions: 1. If I change the thumbnail dimensions for an image record, is there a way to trigger a process to recreate all thumbs for that particular database? 2. Is there a setting somewhere to control the quality/compression of the generated thumbnnail? Thanks.

Hi, Here in our install, the search template feature from Pages doesn't seem to be working. If I type in any word I am looking for, nothing happens. I don't know if this is only happening here or it is a core bug. Thanks.

Will take a look into that, thanks.

@opentype See my screenshot in the topic linked in the first post to better understand my suggestion. My suggestion is for it to show "Updated on [date]" instead of displaying the original published date, because it looks weird when you set up a stream to list the latest contents from the past, say, 7 days, and suddenly you see an article saying it was posted 9 years ago there.

Thanks @Jim M, I was unaware of that.

Please take a look if in Template: core > front > global > thumbImage This: <img {{if $lazyLoad && settings.lazy_load_enabled}}src='{expression="\IPS\Text\Parser::blankImage()"}' data-{{endif}}src='{file="$image" extension="$extension"}' alt=''> Shouldn't be this: <img {{if $lazyLoad && settings.lazy_load_enabled}}src='{expression="\IPS\Text\Parser::blankImage()"}' data-{{endif}}src='{file="$image" extension="$extension"}' alt='$name'> Cheers.

@opentype When the item is edited only

When articles are edited in Pages, they show up as a recent activity in the activity streams, however the date displayed is their original published date, and not the edited date. This looks weird, because we end up have items with really old dates in the middle of a list containing very recent items. A detailed description of this issue is discussed here: