Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications By Matt Monday at 02:04 PM
matma4u.pl Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 I have installed on VPS - Memcached (Version 1.0.2 ) In conf_global.php schould be: $INFO['use_memcached'] = '1'; $INFO['memcached_server_1'] = '127.0.0.1'; $INFO['memcached_port_1'] = '11211'; or $INFO['use_memcache'] = '1'; $INFO['memcache_server_1'] = '127.0.0.1'; $INFO['memcache_port_1'] = '11211'; How to check if this setting (Memcached) works?
matma4u.pl Posted December 21, 2011 Author Posted December 21, 2011 It isn't true. Look: memcache or memcached
Robulosity2 Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 Apparently Im blindhttp://community.invisionpower.com/resources/documentation/index.html/_/tutorials/large-communities/using-alternate-cache-storage-r169
Grumpy Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 Apparently Im blindhttp://community.inv...he-storage-r169 lol. I was staring for like a whole minute...
Management Lindy Posted December 23, 2011 Management Posted December 23, 2011 If you're reaching the point where you're considering memcache on a VPS, you should upgrade to a dedicated server. VPS is great for isolation, but from our own experiences with clients, they're terrible for performance.
Grumpy Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 would like some direction on this too. Not sure what you mean... If you are referring to Lindy's post, memcached is something that's often used for distributed systems. Something like xcache will often perform better under a single machine system. However, I disagree with his post. No matter how small your system is, I believe optimization is something not to shy away from. Comparing no memcache vs memcache on a vps without any other caches, having it is clearly better.
Dmacleo Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 no, whether to use memcache or memcacheD in the conf file.
Grumpy Posted December 25, 2011 Posted December 25, 2011 It is WITHOUT the d as outlined in this document: http://community.invisionpower.com/resources/documentation/index.html/_/tutorials/large-communities/using-alternate-cache-storage-r169
Dmacleo Posted December 25, 2011 Posted December 25, 2011 so if module with D is whats loaded using no D in file still works?
Grumpy Posted December 25, 2011 Posted December 25, 2011 The service that's running on the computer is called Memory Cache, short form: memcache But it's a daemon, a service. So the executable is called memcached just like how httpd, mysqld and etc are named for their daemons. The PHP extension that IPB uses is called memcache Although there is a newer version called memcached If you installed the memcached php extension, I don't think IPB will work. The syntax for it is different. Though, I haven't tested it and IPB may have a detection code for it... The memcached php extension is not a daemon, I have no clue why they named it like that to add to the extra confusion.
Dmacleo Posted December 25, 2011 Posted December 25, 2011 ok, thanks much. I appreaciate the breakdown/info.
matma4u.pl Posted March 24, 2012 Author Posted March 24, 2012 My PHP info looks like that: and now what should be in configuration files? How check if IPB works with memcached?
Lee69 Posted March 24, 2012 Posted March 24, 2012 However, I disagree with his post. No matter how small your system is, I believe optimization is something not to shy away from. I disagree with Lindy's post as well. We used to be on an unoptimised dedicated server paying £100 per month. I moved over to an unmanaged VPS, setting up nginx and few other things... it performs unbelievably faster for a fraction of the cost. Took a little learning, but I'm glad I spent the time on it.
raindog308 Posted March 24, 2012 Posted March 24, 2012 I disagree with Lindy, too, though on a different point. I would not dismiss VPS systems as being low-performance. World of difference in performance between a $5/mo low-end VPS and a provider like Linode. There are high-quality, high-performance VPS providers. Heck, that's what most cloud providers like Amazon are.
tpq Posted April 10, 2012 Posted April 10, 2012 At the higher ends, though, VPSes are generally more expensive than a regular old commodity dedicated server. A busy forum is pretty memory intensive, which is where all those guys will get you :)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.