Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications By Matt November 11, 2024
Bluedeep Posted October 3, 2008 Posted October 3, 2008 With 2.3.6, we use recaptcha now. But... why don't implement also undisposable?http://undisposable.net/ Thank you
Jaggi Posted October 3, 2008 Posted October 3, 2008 anyone could just report a email to that list its not really accurate.
Amy T Posted October 3, 2008 Posted October 3, 2008 anyone could just report a email to that list its not really accurate. Yep I agree. If you do not want members using disposable emails just blocked them using the ban filter.
W13 Posted October 3, 2008 Posted October 3, 2008 Useless feature. (And I'd rather not have IPB depend on too much other stuff)
Amy T Posted October 3, 2008 Posted October 3, 2008 Useless feature. (And I'd rather not have IPB depend on too much other stuff) Ditto. I think the OP should just use the ban list to ban disposable emails.
Bluedeep Posted October 4, 2008 Posted October 4, 2008 Have you idea, how many new disposable domain are created every day? Undisposable use the same system of DNSBL, a collaborative system of feedback... Every feedback is checked before flag it... Truly speaking, are three lines of code, and who wouldn't use it, is enough swich off on the admin panel. Bye
Deltafox Posted October 4, 2008 Posted October 4, 2008 I believe both a good idea, and each has the right to express it... it depends then on the staff ipb to decide.. Regards
Morrigan Posted October 4, 2008 Posted October 4, 2008 I believe both a good idea, and each has the right to express it... it depends then on the staff ipb to decide.. RegardsIPB considers all suggestions but they also consider the majority of the customer response as well. I personally wouldn't want this.
Amy T Posted October 4, 2008 Posted October 4, 2008 ya I do not want it either. I use gmail as my primary email and gmail is now considered a disposable email.
Cool Surfer Posted October 4, 2008 Posted October 4, 2008 With 2.3.6, we use recaptcha now. But... why don't implement also undisposable?http://undisposable.net/ Thank you So it basically tell u if the email id exists or not ? I am sure bot programmers are smart guys, they can have a script to auto generate valid email ids too before the request goes to undisposable.
Bluedeep Posted October 5, 2008 Posted October 5, 2008 ya I do not want it either. I use gmail as my primary email and gmail is now considered a disposable email. Is impossible. Gmail is not a disposable email.So it basically tell u if the email id exists or not ? I am sure bot programmers are smart guys, they can have a script to auto generate valid email ids too before the request goes to undisposable. It doesn't check if an emails it exists or not is a collaborative protection system against disposable email addressing (DEA). If is collaborative, yes: if script kiddie makes a new undisposable email it could pass some time before that email will be add to the blacklist... But each blacklist works as is. -- The question is could be usefull? My answer is yes. People who wouldn't use it, could always turn off it, don't?
sunrisecc Posted October 5, 2008 Posted October 5, 2008 Gmail is not a disposable email. Any mail account that one could obtain without paying for it is 'disposable' for me. Such email accounts are only slightly above the pure throw-away email address.
Bluedeep Posted October 5, 2008 Posted October 5, 2008 Any mail account that one could obtain without paying for it is 'disposable' for me. Such email accounts are only slightly above the pure throw-away email address. Gmail could be used as disposable, but providers as jetable.org and pookmail certainly disposable. However, no one of the disposable blacklist consider gmail (or yahoo, msn, ecc...) as disposable :)
bfarber Posted October 6, 2008 Posted October 6, 2008 Gmail could be used as disposable, but providers as jetable.org and pookmail certainly disposable. However, no one of the disposable blacklist consider gmail (or yahoo, msn, ecc...) as disposable :) Then I don't see how much good it would do, as 50-80% (at least here) of the recent spammings came from a @gmail.com email address account.
Bluedeep Posted October 6, 2008 Posted October 6, 2008 Then I don't see how much good it would do, as 50-80% (at least here) of the recent spammings came from a @gmail.com email address account. Yeah, but the point is to fight users who use disposable account. If an email exist few minutes, then why require email validation during the registration? My two cents ;)
W13 Posted October 6, 2008 Posted October 6, 2008 Yeah, but the point is to fight users who use disposable account. If an email exist few minutes, then why require email validation during the registration? My two cents ;) It takes a Chinese email farmer like 20 seconds to register a new gmail account. (probably less time than it takes to register on IPB)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.