Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications By Matt Monday at 02:04 PM
Echelon One Posted November 17, 2010 Posted November 17, 2010 Gary, quick question... I just followed your tutorial on eAccelerator, but I am puzzled by one line.Change to eaccelerator.shm_size="1" Surely, this disables the caching totally in eA?? I tried your tutorial, eventhough my PHP info is showing it as installed and so is php -v the actual /dev/ea directory never caches any files. I have got vBSEO setup on one account and that shows eAccelerator as not available. Now, I'm puzzled..
Gary. Posted November 17, 2010 Posted November 17, 2010 Have you changed the line: change this lineeaccelerator.cache_dir="/tmp/eaccelerator" toeaccelerator.cache_dir="/dev/ea" and made the directory aswell as make it writable ?mkdir /dev/eachmod 777 /dev/ea Then restart LiteSpeed: This value:Change to eaccelerator.shm_size="1" I put to this low as Litespeed can spawn upto 10 threads per cycle, And if you have alot of incoming connections this will build up your memory very fast if its on the default 16, Now there will be no performance lost setting to this value.
Echelon One Posted November 17, 2010 Posted November 17, 2010 Thanks Gary, I must be having a blonde day! lol Forgot to Restart LiteSpeed, now I have directories and files in the /dev/ea Much appreciated! :)
Gary. Posted November 18, 2010 Posted November 18, 2010 No problem my friend, I hope this works well for you. Leave it for 24hours, Then check memory and such, You may be able to increase the output in the SHM :) But let me know how it goes please. Thanks.
Bono Posted November 21, 2010 Posted November 21, 2010 Server is atm idling but in heavy usage memory difference is huge. Memory usage: Apache 2.2.15 total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 4053 3808 244 0 257 2584 -/+ buffers/cache: 966 3087 Swap: 2047 41 2006 LiteSpeed 4.0.17 total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 4053 3504 549 0 257 2635 -/+ buffers/cache: 611 3442 Swap: 2047 41 2006
Gary. Posted November 21, 2010 Posted November 21, 2010 The only possablility of that is when switching to LSWS all the php processes must not have died properly causing apache and LSWB to function at the same time. What you should do is kill all php processes / apache processes from the command line, It will not do anything just when LSWS is set then the old processes will not start and the ones that do will be just from litespeed. If your using the WHM plugin you can do it by clicking your average server loads top right Then select kill all processes by [THIS_USER]
Bono Posted November 21, 2010 Posted November 21, 2010 It just proves LSWS has better memory management than Apache, of course all processes were slayed.
Gary. Posted November 21, 2010 Posted November 21, 2010 So I guess by killing all php processes worked ? It would have took your swap down alot too :)
Bono Posted November 21, 2010 Posted November 21, 2010 No i'm just saying that I did that when I took those stats.
Gary. Posted November 21, 2010 Posted November 21, 2010 Ohh, But yes LSWS does have a 30% memory loss when switching from apache.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.