MarcusInMd Posted April 14, 2007 Posted April 14, 2007 We have several other websites on this server, HOWEVER, they are very minor sites with little traffic. Most, if not all of those requests are from IPB. Should I disable that members online today mod by removing it from the code or just turning it off? I have turned it off in the past and it has not helped one bit. I checked the apache access logs from the server load spike and there is not much recorded. Nothing out of the ordinary etc. These are ALL of the entries for 4/12/07 in the access log: - - [12/Apr/2007:03:58:38 -0400] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.1" 404 270 "-" "IRLbot/3.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; http://irl.cs.tamu.edu/crawler)" - - [12/Apr/2007:09:08:36 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 1481 "http://models.easternuswx.com/gfsloop.php?run=6&map=2&rtype=em" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; InfoPath.1)" - - [12/Apr/2007:10:33:23 -0400] "GET /bb/style_images/customskin/f_closed.gif HTTP/1.1" 400 281 "http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/index.php?showforum=26" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)" - - [12/Apr/2007:12:34:13 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 400 281 "http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=midwest+weather&btnG=Search" "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.9" - - [12/Apr/2007:14:32:12 -0400] "GET /bb/lofiversion/index.php/t85170.html HTTP/1.1" 404 296 "http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&q=ric_wx&btnG=Google+Search" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3" - - [12/Apr/2007:14:32:12 -0400] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1" 404 271 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3" - - [12/Apr/2007:14:50:31 -0400] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.1" 404 270 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)" - - [12/Apr/2007:14:50:32 -0400] "GET /bb/lofiversion/index.php/t18931.html HTTP/1.1" 404 296 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)" - - [12/Apr/2007:14:50:44 -0400] "GET /bb/lofiversion/index.php/t72897.html HTTP/1.1" 404 296 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)" - - [12/Apr/2007:17:56:10 -0400] "GET /tempwebcam/webcam.jpg HTTP/1.1" 404 281 "http://www.laconiabikeweek.net/webcam.htm" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0)" - - [12/Apr/2007:21:30:05 -0400] "GET /bb/style_images/customskin/folder_editor_images/rte-italic.png HTTP/1.1" 400 281 "http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/index.php?showtopic=131872" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)" - - [12/Apr/2007:22:14:37 -0400] "GET /bb/style_images/customskin/iframe.html HTTP/1.1" 400 281 "http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/index.php?act=SF&s=&f=15" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)" - - [12/Apr/2007:22:14:37 -0400] "GET /bb/style_images/customskin/iframe.html HTTP/1.1" 400 281 "http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/index.php?act=SF&s=&f=15" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)" - - [12/Apr/2007:22:40:46 -0400] "GET /bb/style_images/customskin/menu_action_down.gif HTTP/1.1" 400 281 "http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/index.php?showtopic=131877&st=120" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)" - - [12/Apr/2007:22:52:03 -0400] "GET /bb/style_images/customskin/menu_action_down.gif HTTP/1.1" 400 281 "http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/index.php?showtopic=131877&st=180" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)"
.CMANNS Posted April 14, 2007 Posted April 14, 2007 I can help you pipe that forum to lighttpd. Just answer my pm and we can see if its httpd's fault.
MarcusInMd Posted April 14, 2007 Posted April 14, 2007 The Web Server (Apache) service on host localhost is down. The problem was discovered on Apr 13, 2007 02:15 PM. I was not around when this happened but it appears that apache crashed on us again yesterday. This was AFTER I had replaced our defective drive too. I am not sure if this was because the degraded array was being rebuilt or not though but I doubt it.
.CMANNS Posted April 14, 2007 Posted April 14, 2007 The Web Server (Apache) service on host localhost is down. The problem was discovered on Apr 13, 2007 02:15 PM. I was not around when this happened but it appears that apache crashed on us again yesterday. This was AFTER I had replaced our defective drive too. I am not sure if this was because the degraded array was being rebuilt or not though but I doubt it. you may want to try something like http_load on another server on one of your forums links with 40-80req/s roughly and see if apache crashes.
MarcusInMd Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Not sure about this but... I uninstalled members online today and the load went from 1.4 with 400 users on to under .5 with 400 users online. Could be a coincidence or not...I will continue to monitor.
MarcusInMd Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Well that didn't last long. LOL Anyone think something is wrong with our DB still?? Just started logging slow-queries again and within 1 minute I got 10 entries into the log. # User@Host: board_user[board_user] @ [192.168.1.1] # Query_time: 3 Lock_time: 0 Rows_sent: 0 Rows_examined: 1718998 use easternuswx_bb; SELECT * FROM ibf_posts WHERE post_key='5e439269f051f182fd141223b4664206'; # Time: 070415 13:48:15 # User@Host: board_user[board_user] @ [192.168.1.1] # Query_time: 3 Lock_time: 0 Rows_sent: 0 Rows_examined: 1718999 SELECT * FROM ibf_posts WHERE post_key='2acb01c39f1f54319b64e605699dbbda'; # Time: 070415 13:48:16 # User@Host: board_user[board_user] @ [192.168.1.1] # Query_time: 3 Lock_time: 0 Rows_sent: 0 Rows_examined: 1718999 SELECT * FROM ibf_posts WHERE post_key='77df59e4de183cb48775d08f20c9b8fd'; # Time: 070415 13:48:28 # User@Host: board_user[board_user] @ [192.168.1.1] # Query_time: 3 Lock_time: 0 Rows_sent: 0 Rows_examined: 1718999 SELECT * FROM ibf_posts WHERE post_key='7309dc7bfbdde360bdc1697174765faa'; # Time: 070415 13:48:44 # User@Host: board_user[board_user] @ [192.168.1.1] # Query_time: 3 Lock_time: 0 Rows_sent: 0 Rows_examined: 1718999 "mysql-slow.log" 44L, 2375C
.CMANNS Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 I doubt it, it says I have slow queries but I don't have high load.
MarcusInMd Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Reading about apache. I noticed that I am using mod_deflate from within apache2. With this enabled I should turn off GZIP compression from within IPB because it would only serve to increase CPU usage.
MarcusInMd Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 I'd turn keepailve on. Set it for about 10sec. Also, the members online today has a known problem where it causes high loads. I'd remove it ASAP. Something on this server besides the forum? Seems like a lot of httpd requests. I thought that Persistent connections were a no-no for larger forums?
.CMANNS Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Thats not true, only if you dont got alot of memory. presistant is needed for high performance ajax applications to function good
MarcusInMd Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 I set keep alive to ON again and the load really didnt change but the pages are loading alot faster.
.CMANNS Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 I set keep alive to ON again and the load really didnt change but the pages are loading alot faster. Exactly, it helps loads & if you got spare memory then its perfectly fine to run.
MarcusInMd Posted April 16, 2007 Posted April 16, 2007 435 user(s) active in the past 15 minutes Load jumped to around 2.35 for a time but is back down to 1.93 442 user(s) active in the past 15 minutes Load back down to .73
MarcusInMd Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 OK, This is with a server that has about 150 people online at the time I was running these tests. http_load -parallel 120 -seconds 10 urls.txt 33 fetches, 120 max parallel, 5.25701e+06 bytes, in 10 seconds 159303 mean bytes/connection 3.3 fetches/sec, 525700 bytes/sec msecs/connect: 175.056 mean, 3082.75 max, 28.995 min msecs/first-response: 2634.54 mean, 6329.01 max, 159.742 min HTTP response codes: code 200 -- 33 http_load -parallel 120 -seconds 10 urls.txt 38 fetches, 120 max parallel, 6.35644e+06 bytes, in 10 seconds 167275 mean bytes/connection 3.79999 fetches/sec, 635642 bytes/sec msecs/connect: 753.114 mean, 6827.92 max, 29.078 min msecs/first-response: 2006.77 mean, 6575.18 max, 203.043 min HTTP response codes: code 200 -- 38 I had to run the test at 120 parallel connections before I saw a noticable problem with the load. On the top test it's with KeepALive Off and the bottom with Keep Alive On. The top test pushed the servers load well 2.5 and almost to 3 almost instantly. The bottom test peaked at about 1.5 and then dropped rather quickly. urls.txt had about 4 links to threads on our forum of varying sizes.
njustice Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 Since you have a lot of memory, you'll probably want to tweak your PHP cache program settings too (eaccel?) Increase the cache memory it's allowed.
.CMANNS Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 test2:/usr/local/bin # ./http_load -parallel 120 -seconds 25 url.txt 35241 fetches, 120 max parallel, 0 bytes, in 25.0001 seconds 0 mean bytes/connection 1409.64 fetches/sec, 0 bytes/sec msecs/connect: 43.8565 mean, 3036.75 max, 32.145 min msecs/first-response: 39.402 mean, 3037.83 max, 32.262 min HTTP response codes: code 301 -- 35241 Thats with 1 url to a board in urls.txt heres multiple to topics with 100posts or so test2:/usr/local/bin # ./http_load -parallel 120 -seconds 25 url.txt 321 fetches, 120 max parallel, 2.7756e+07 bytes, in 25 seconds 86467.3 mean bytes/connection 12.84 fetches/sec, 1.11024e+06 bytes/sec msecs/connect: 33.189 mean, 50.165 max, 32.204 min msecs/first-response: 6279.25 mean, 18109.1 max, 32.472 min HTTP response codes: code 200 -- 196 code 301 -- 125 On the webserver load was around 7 and on the db server load was .30 avg Once i get xcache installed that should become cake for the servers..btw eaccel is the best to use for php caching
coolservers Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 Script output: Table admin_permission_keys - Index perm_main OK! Table admin_permission_keys - Index perm_child OK! Table attachments - Index attach_pid OK! Error : Table attachments : Missing index attach_msg Table attachments - Index attach_post_key OK! Table attachments - Index attach_mid_size OK! Table cal_events - Index daterange OK! Table cal_events - Index approved OK! Table dnames_change - Index dname_member_id OK! Table dnames_change - Index date_id OK! Table email_logs - Index from_member_id OK! Table email_logs - Index email_date OK! Table member_extra - Index id OK! Table members_converge - Index converge_email OK! Table members - Index id OK! Error : Table members : Missing index name Table members - Index mgroup OK! Table members - Index bday_day OK! Table members - Index bday_month OK! Error : Table members : Missing index members_display_name Table message_text - Index msg_date OK! Table message_text - Index msg_sent_to_count OK! Table message_text - Index msg_deleted_count OK! Table message_topics - Index mt_from_id OK! Table message_topics - Index mt_owner_id OK! Table message_text - Index msg_sent_to_count OK! Table message_text - Index msg_deleted_count OK! Table moderators - Index forum_id OK! Table moderators - Index group_id OK! Table moderators - Index member_id OK! Table posts - Index topic_id OK! Table posts - Index author_id OK! Table posts - Index post_date OK! Table sessions - Index location1 OK! Table sessions - Index location2 OK! Table sessions - Index location3 OK! Table skin_templates_cache - Index template_set_id OK! Table skin_templates_cache - Index template_group_name OK! Table templates_diff_import - Index diff_func_group OK! Table templates_diff_import - Index diff_func_name OK! Table template_diff_changes - Index diff_change_func_group OK! Table template_diff_changes - Index diff_change_type OK! Table topic_markers - Index marker_forum_id OK! Table topic_markers - Index marker_member_id OK! Table topics - Index topic_firstpost OK! Table topics - Index last_post OK! Table topics - Index forum_id OK!
coolservers Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 phpadmin Your SQL query has been executed successfully SQL query: ALTER TABLE ibf_attachments ADD INDEX attach_msg( attach_msg ) ;# Affected rows: 2059 ALTER TABLE ibf_members ADD INDEX name( name ) ;# Affected rows: 2970 ALTER TABLE ibf_members ADD INDEX members_display_name( members_display_name ) # Affected rows: 2970 im running version 2.2
MarcusInMd Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 What does all the http_load output mean? It looks like you are getting over 3000 fetches/sec and I am way below that yet my server load was much, much lower than yours. Anyone care to explain? Wow, I just checked our indexes since I upgraded to 2.2.2 and these were missing: ibf_attachments_type atype Missing field 'atype_post' Fix Automatically | Fix Manually ALTER TABLE ibf_attachments_type DROP INDEX atype, ADD INDEX atype (atype_post,atype_photo); ibf_attachments_type atype Missing field 'atype_photo' Fix Automatically | Fix Manually ibf_message_topics mt_owner_id Missing field 'mt_date' ibf_posts post_key ibf_titles posts
njustice Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 Those missing indexes (especially the posts) will negatively impact performance! You rebuilt them? Notice an improvement?
MarcusInMd Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 Not yet. But I plan to right now. Were they introduced in 2.2.2 because the last time I checked the indexes all were there.
.CMANNS Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 Not yet. But I plan to right now. Were they introduced in 2.2.2 because the last time I checked the indexes all were there. Theres a error in the 2.2.2 checker. If you look at it it looks like my server had higher performance getting the pages :P msecs/first-response: 2634.54 mean, 6329.01 max, 159.742 min my load may have been higher but a high load isn't always bad ;) when the dbservers done being configured and I add the custom my.cnf the avg load will be in the 1-2's. Avarage Load is everthing, memory, harddrive, etc. If your load is .50 or less then your servers not being used muchat alll
coolservers Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 Those missing indexes (especially the posts) will negatively impact performance! You rebuilt them? Notice an improvement? server crashed few times a day after doing the php check and adding those tables not only does my forums FLY it has not crashed but sometimes it happend a few days later i will report back in one week if no crashes then that was my cause thank you whoever post that i own u one
MarcusInMd Posted April 21, 2007 Posted April 21, 2007 The automated index fix would not work on these indexes: ibf_attachments_type atype Missing field 'atype_post' Fix Automatically | Fix Manually ALTER TABLE ibf_attachments_type DROP INDEX atype, ADD INDEX atype (atype_post,atype_photo); ibf_attachments_type atype Missing field 'atype_photo' If did however add indexes for the rest of the indexes.
.CMANNS Posted April 21, 2007 Posted April 21, 2007 The automated index fix would not work on these indexes: ibf_attachments_type atype Missing field 'atype_post' Fix Automatically | Fix Manually ALTER TABLE ibf_attachments_type DROP INDEX atype, ADD INDEX atype (atype_post,atype_photo); ibf_attachments_type atype Missing field 'atype_photo' If did however add indexes for the rest of the indexes. no no no The index checker is borked k? Those tables display broken with it.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.