File Name: (SOS30) Reputation System per Forum v1.0.0
File Submitter: Adriano Faria
File Submitted: 20 Jul 2009
File Category: Modifications

This mod allows you to use reputation system per forum.

New setting on Manage Forums


Mod in use

Modified Files:

• admin/applications/forums/modules_admin/forums/forums.php
• admin/applications/forums/skin_cp/cp_skin_forums.php
• admin/sources/classes/class_reputation_cache.php

Template Modified:

• Topic View -> topicViewTemplate

Click here to download this file

installed. but i have the word in portughes

i try to translate in language menager but don't work :(

edit: sorry it s good ;)

thanks

Does it work with IPB 3.1.4?

Probably not.

Yep it does. Tried it anyway. And it worked :)

Adriano I get the impression that you put out a mod but you have no time to upgrade them (at least some of them) because your busy making new mods, why? :D

Yeap... Actually, I don't know if it worths the while to update it. Reputation system will be different in 3.2.X.

How much different? You know something the rest of us dont? :blink:

Nope: http://community.invisionpower.com/blog/1174/entry-5844-ipboard-320-new-reputation-mode-like/

:)

I noticed a probable bug. If you have IP.Blog installed you cannot rep blog entries anymore. Gives an error that theres no right to rep stuff in this forum when you are infact in a Blog, not in a forum.

Hey, Maxxius, I don't use 3.0.X for ages... I won't support this hook (IP.Board 3.0.X) anymore, not even IPS does. If you're using this in 3.1.X, that can be the problem.

Yup, I did use it in 3.1.4 and it did its job perectly.

Sad I have to let this mod go for testing :/ this sucks....

Please at least update this mod for 3.2 if IPS does not add that as a core feature..

Ok. I'll take a look in a few days.

So for 3.1.4 you will not consider providing a fix for IP.Blog reputation so it would be possible to rep blog entries? Or perhaps you will? :)

Probably not. I'm updating everything for 3.2.

is it working for ipb 3.2?? :unsure:

anyone?? :unsure:

I second the 3.2 request , we really need this for 3.2 also :sad: