Jump to content

Suggestion for IPB 3.0


Guest idanz

Recommended Posts

Yes Yes exactly!


That's what I meant to, an option to import a SOAP service (in simple words - [b]webservice[/b]).


I didn't asked a .NET/ASP.NET support like Zero-CU the moron thinks.


And like you sayed, with webservice you can do [b]everything[/b], and that would be a great improvement for IPB.


Everything as in anything? That could become a security risk If you think about it. I was always under the impression IPB was looking to 'improve' security, not degrade it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Everything as in anything? That could become a security risk If you think about it. I was always under the impression IPB was looking to 'improve' security, not degrade it.


I agree. They are not going to expose the DB class (or whatever it becomes in 3) as a service. That would be a security nightmare.

Keith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally web site APIs don't cover things like database classes, they'd cover things like member data, posts, calendar items, etc.

If those could be exposed in a HTTP-accessible API, be it SOAP or something else, I think that'd be a great addition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally web site APIs don't cover things like database classes, they'd cover things like member data, posts, calendar items, etc.



If those could be exposed in a HTTP-accessible API, be it SOAP or something else, I think that'd be a great addition.


True, but I'm trying to make sure the OP realizes this. I'm not sure that what he's looking to do would be covered by those exposed items. But I still would like to hear what kind of mods he plans to make with this interface.

Keith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...