Adriano Faria

https://invisioncommunity.com/clients/purchases/

Replied above. 👍

Yes, it's enabled: Do you mean the License Key? Sure. I don't see any option to enter the license key in Integrations for the Geo. @Matt, got it. Registration was disabled as it is a test site. Working now. Thanks.

My bad. I see the Action to take for disposable emails. I also see the Require guests to verify their email? in Contact Us settings. I can't find the Geolocation Settings tab on the Spam Prevention page.

Is this part of 4.7.13 Beta 1? The new tab don't appear to me: Actually, I can't find any of the new features. Thanks.

Hello, I don't think my question is related to Menus or if there will be a new blog entry to cover it. I'll ask anyways. Will we be able to add buttons to the items view, like in the topic view (red area)? Thank you.

Ok. Somehow I thought it would be tied to a product (package) due to its name. Guess I’m wrong? Thanks.

I need to move users to another group when they make a purchase a file in Downloads. Is there any way to get that information? An achievement rule could be an easy way to do it but there isn’t such a rule currently.

@Esther E. Just to confirm: will this return all data from the invoice? I mean, I need at least the i_items, to see if the invoice belongs to a purchase of a Downloads file. Thank you.

Of course. What I'm trying to do is get some answers as we're left in the limbo.

Base classes (topic, file, etc) or global (\IPS\Content\Item). Kinda confusing it. We need to make it globally. - Visit a profile: When will be the "point"? It's missing only nodes in UI Extensions. As Member isn't a node, I'm wondering. - Ignore/stop ignoring something (posts/messages/mentions). So what is the outcome of the discussion?

Were all the suggestions made (by me and others) implemented or?

Basically, I have a content item that has a "privacy" column. If it is private, it shows to the item creator only; public shows to everyone. I can't use my getItemsWithPermission() because, you know, it is static so I can't check the author against the logged member. Even if I could use it, I wouldn't use it because the item must be accessible by direct link. It just can't be listed.

I have a few resources but also know others who restrict items viewing by extending \IPS\Helpers\Table\Content::getRows(). Will this be possible somehow?

Waiting. 👍

Come on, it’s exactly the opposite. Some are possible. Most won’t be. Bookmarking this to use later. 👍 I will make a list of my resources that will not be possible to update, after initial tests on V5, of course.

So I assume this check: {{if ( $topic->canPin() or $topic->canUnpin() or $topic->canFeature() or $topic->canUnfeature() or $topic->canHide() or $topic->canUnhide() or $topic->canMove() or $topic->canLock() or $topic->canUnlock() or $topic->canDelete() or $topic->availableSavedActions() or $topic->canMerge() or $topic->canUnarchive() or $topic->canRemoveArchiveExcludeFlag() or \IPS\Member::loggedIn()->modPermission('can_view_moderation_log') or $topic->canToggleItemModeration() ) or ( $topic->isFutureDate() and $topic::canFuturePublish( NULL, $topic->container() ) ) or ( $topic->hidden() == -2 AND \IPS\Member::loggedIn()->modPermission('can_manage_deleted_content') )}} for topics, for example, won't be necessary anymore as I can make the checking for each entry in the extension, right? This is a limitation that prevents us from adding links in the Action menu.

Am I able to add a new entry in any position in the content item menu or only in the first/last position? See this example: It wouldn't make much sense to add this specific links after the Moderator History.

A few examples: https://invisioncommunity.com/files/file/7833-profile-field-per-user-group/ https://invisioncommunity.com/files/file/8783-enhanced-links-moderation/ There are a ton from other devs. Everywhere. For the most varied reasons and purposes. Anyway, this is just to confirm that this will not be the game-changer; it was expected and I really don’t want to enter in another debate like the first blog entry. That’s all I have to say. 👍

Edir profile. Profile field. A lot in ACP.

Hello, Is this part specific for content? I suppose we will be able to do this in other places too and not only in content related stuff, right? There are tons of templates and forms out there that we can extend today.

I suppose the most used menus, like moderation ones (pin/unpin, feature/unfeature, etc.) probably are already there, right? Or do we need to create all links for our content items?

Wow. This definitely a guy ahead of his time.

I’ll try. Plugins don’t. Applications will. Everything you could do with a plugin, you always could with an application because both used hooks; it was powerful and you could do basically everything. Hooks are removed in V5. It won’t be possible anymore and it’s been replaced by a hook-points system (a.k.a. Listeners) and a UIExtension, which we don’t know as they didn’t blog about it yet. It will be more limited/restricted, no doubt. Matt said, you can do a lot, but you can’t do everything you could before. The doubt now is how much limited it is compared to hooks. Translating to marketplace resources: my guess is that a few (compared to the totality) applications/plugins will be fully upgraded to V5. Some will be upgraded but will lost some functionalities (due to hooks it may have today) but vast majority don’t, at least in first moment; improvements will be necessary along the way. I guess we’ll have to wait and see. Get your popcorn and have a seat. Only time will tell. Marketplace rules will change for V5. 3rd-party devs probably will be allowed to create similar resources.

Probably... and due to that, the devs get tired of releasing new stuff and it gets a couple of purchases. There is certainly more to it than that.