Jump to content

Marc

Invision Community Team
  • Posts

    15,909
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    277

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Projects

Release Notes v5

Invision Community 5 Bug Tracker

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Marc

  1. If you are referring here to existing extentions that were written for version 4 working in version 5, you are correct. Items would need to be rewritten for version 5
  2. Indeed that one was confirmed to be a bug 🙂
  3. I dont seem to be able to replicate the issue with thumbnails. I suspect it may have been related to your other problem there
  4. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! I can confirm this should be further reviewed and I have logged an internal bug report for our development team to investigate and address as necessary, in a future maintenance release.
  5. You would need to cut down the size of the file you are updating, as its very likely its timing out unfortunately
  6. There is no setting which would do this at the present time. Feel free to post up within our feedback area if this is something you wish to see in the fuure. At present, once clicked, it is assumed you are happy to view NSFW content.
  7. Split this one into its own topic and reported
  8. I have just taken a look at this, and they are already excluded. This is only if the account is permanently banned. From what you are saying, you are not actually using the ban function, so that would not be excluded. The item you are referring to with "Do not allow filtering" is not what you are trying to use it for here. It means the "group" shows up nowhere. It doesnt mean the member doesnt show in places
  9. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! I can confirm this should be further reviewed and I have logged an internal bug report for our development team to investigate and address as necessary, in a future maintenance release.
  10. They wouldnt get the banned message. They would just get the login screen.
  11. No problem. Glad to see thats sorted for you
  12. This is something that has been brought up in the past, but is indeed how the system works at present. We dont have moderation on content edits at present. What you could is to limit the length of time people can edit for, which can somewhat mitigate the issue. I realise thats not exactly what you are after here, but thought I would put it forward as an option
  13. You are responding to something over 4 years old there, but the same answer would apply. You would need to ask for specifics on what they are referring to
  14. Are you trying to add html using the translation system at all?
  15. The above is indeed accurate. Start at a smaller size and work your way up to a size that is suitable.
  16. There should be a share icon at the top of each. Bear in mind this will only show if guests can view. Is this the case?
  17. Emails are sent using our cloud email account which is the same for everyone. If you wanted to have something specific to your own brand, you would need your own email service for this
  18. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! I can confirm this should be further reviewed and I have logged an internal bug report for our development team to investigate and address as necessary, in a future maintenance release.
  19. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! I can confirm this should be further reviewed and I have logged an internal bug report for our development team to investigate and address as necessary, in a future maintenance release.
  20. It depends on the betas 🙂 May well be before then. You will be able to upgrade Yes, version 5 will be available on our classic offering. There arent any planned. Thats not to say prices will be the same forever, of course lol. But nothing planned at present There are no plans for this at present. Feel free to post within our feedback area if you wish to see things like this added in the future. I would think however that dropbox and google drive probably wouldnt be suitable for the file storage side of a site
  21. These were removed in earlier releases for a few reasons, but one of the main ones being they simply dont work in todays community environments. For example, I may have post 1, 2,3. If you cant see post 2, do you have post 1 and 3? If so, what if I dont want you to know that post 2 is hidden? This is just one example
  22. Looking at this now for you
  23. Could you PM me the code you are seeing? I can then take a look. I suspect this is simply not where you think it is
  24. These should indeed update right away (minus a small amount of caching for guests on cloud). If you remove this entirely, is it being removed from the source? Just so we can rule out it just not showing what you expect?
  25. We can take a look to block these from google entirely, but Im pointing out here that there is not an issue as such here. Google would not penalize you for blocking items you dont wish to be indexed. It will simply not index them, which is exactly what we want it to do. As I said, we will look at it. As I mentioned above, csrf is a security element of URLs relating to the identification of users.
×
×
  • Create New...