Hey, nice seeing the update on here. I do have a question but I don’t really know where to post it. It is supposed to have black bars?

It seems like a lot of dead space. Thank you.

Not entirely sure what you’re talking about. Could you please further elaborate? I do not see any black bars.

I think he’s saying the page is not being fully responsive at full width. It reaches a max size and not expanded further.

Yes, that coloring is intentional

17 hours ago, Jim M said:

Not entirely sure what you’re talking about. Could you please further elaborate? I do not see any black bars.

It’s not full width, thats what I mean.

17 hours ago, Marc said:

Yes, that coloring is intentional

Got it. Thanks.

19 hours ago, Marc said:

Yes, that coloring is intentional

I’m sure there are reasons why v5 is not fully responsive. Can you elaborate on what the reasoning is?

Thanks.

26 minutes ago, My Sharona said:

I’m sure there are reasons why v5 is not fully responsive. Can you elaborate on what the reasoning is?

Thanks.

I what manner would you say its not fully responsive?

40 minutes ago, Marc said:

I what manner would you say its not fully responsive?

The width.

20 hours ago, Randy Calvert said:

I think he’s saying the page is not being fully responsive at full width. It reaches a max size and not expanded further.

That said, I’m not seeing it on my monitor, but that may simply be because it is not that wide.

12 minutes ago, My Sharona said:

The width.

That said, I’m not seeing it on my monitor, but that may simply be because it is not that wide.

This is merely the extension of the width which our designers applied. I think you just proved the point on why they applied it with not having a screen that large 😁. Version 5 is fully responsive. You can grow and shrink your browser window to see this.

2 hours ago, Jim M said:

This is merely the extension of the width which our designers applied.

They maybe need to look again then, as it looks a bit ridiculous at monitor widths above 1800px (which isn’t that wide).

1 minute ago, Dll said:

They maybe need to look again then, as it looks a bit ridiculous at monitor widths above 1800px (which isn’t that wide).

It really provides no other disadvantage than you don’t get the background full width here on our website. While we understand your feedback and brought it internally, as you can respect, it isn’t the most pressing thing with getting version 5 out that we make a change to it only on our website 🙂.

The average consumer likely won’t even notice at that as well. I’m not the average consumer and can say I didn’t on my 4K monitor.

7 hours ago, Marc said:

I what manner would you say its not fully responsive?

Because they have a huge screen haha

10 hours ago, Ticaga said:

Because they have a huge screen haha

And intentional fixed width on a large screen has no baring in any way as to whether or not the site is responsive in design.