Como

Thank you for the suggestion, but I clear the cache fairly often for various reasons. It is not the cause of our problems. It is entirely possible that this first occurred six months ago. Because it is intermittent, and generally takes after the first attempt, I just worked around it and somewhat forgot about it. My recollection is that I noticed this after an update, but I do not know which one.

Usually, Firefox. I'll check with the two members.

Hi, A couple of members have reported that 'Quote Selection' has been unreliable of late. This mirrors my own experience. The collective perception is that this has been a problem for some weeks; maybe a couple of months - it is hard to be exact. It is intermittent, and I think it occurs here too - though maybe not as intermittent as my site. I'll keep testing to better determine if it is truly occurring here as we as at my site. When text is highlighted, the Quote Selection otten fails to display. Where there any changes to the code in the 1-2 month time frame which might affect Quote Selection? To add: Except for a couple of older apps (which I have not updated), I just disabled apps at my site. The bug seemed unchanged. There (and here), Quote Selection mostly fails when first visiting the page (or upon refresh), but usually works after the first failed attempt.

Update: I just edited my shortcut link (Firefox) from https://invisioncommunity.com to https://invisioncommunity.com/forums/ and it again failed. This is the only shortcut which fails. (I've tried yet again, and the favicon for the /forums/ shortcut still fails.) The root domain works correctly:

Ah. Makes sense. Thanks.

Odd. For some reason it no longer appears in my Firefox tile shortcuts. I also tried couple of online favicon checker resources and they indicated that there is a problem. But I just recreated the tile and all is fine. Not sure why the online checkers indicated problems.

Hi. Unless I a missing something, there is no option to return the color of spoilers and boxes to their default color.

The favicon appears to be missing for some (maybe all) of this site.

Hi @Brad Brown I am unsure how long Invision has provided Zapier integration (perhaps post-dates development of your app), but just maybe you could replicate your login handler using that. (Though, there are monthly fees associated with using Zapier.) Maybe check out Zapier and see if provides the login handler integration(s) you need. https://zapier.com/pricing

I'm not so sure. Younger people (and probably most people) are more used to selecting emoji from lists. ™ ® © are parsed into their respective symbols, so there is a somewhat related precedent. Still, :) seems rather reminiscent bulletin board code, and Invision have (understandably) moved away from that for a long time now. Maybe it deserves to be an app. ;)

Hi @Marc I remain puzzled by the rationale for this restriction. Items in the Contents list are truncated text-overflow: ellipsis; - so I can see no problem there - and content block headers are unrestricted (which is as it should be). How would layouts be broken if the restriction on what might be added to the Contents list was lifted? As it stands, some content blocks and headings are available to be listed in the list of contents, while others are not. This limitation seems arbitrary and breaks the Contents list generator. Personally, I'd like to see the ability to add any heading or paragraph to the Contents list so that it covers any and all eventualities. Let the community operator decide what works best for them. I am using Contents for an FAQ list, but questions are limited to 100 characters. Yes, I can use the workaround I posted above, but why must I jump through hoops to accomplish this? It also would be nice to be to disable ellipsis on selected items in the Contest list, where display of the full, non-truncated title would be advantageous.

@Scotty Hutto I may not properly understand your aim, or what you already have in place, but there is an app which might be of interest to you: https://administrata.net/software/item/64-automated-newsletters/

@Duncan Swan @Cedric V Hi Duncan. Maybe this app would work for you: https://www.sosinvision.com.br/index.php?/file/461-services/ In use here: https://invisioncommunity.com/__old/third-party/providers-directory/

I don't know, @Rebecca Jorgensen. I just thought it would be worth you exploring. Tagging the developer, @ClawOfWinterfell. Claw is very helpful.

Hi @Rebecca Jorgensen Did you check out the app I suggested earlier in this topic? It might be worth a conversation with the developer.

This is unclear to me. The Who's Online page is still unavailable on my site.

It is not just you, @Edjazoli - I am here to see if this had already been reported.

By the way, my bug report was for Pages - but it obviously occurs within posts too.

For clarity, I mean a spoiler nested within a Box; not a spoiler within a spoiler.

Of course. But your image shows the horizontal rule and space underneath, which reflects my experience. The is in the spoiled mode (and nested), and does not occur when unnested. I removed my CSS and this is the result: When I add my CSS: And testing here: Box Title Content. Spoiler Title Spoiler Title Similar result to my site.

There is no option to add nested spoilers (within Boxes at least) to the Table of Contents.

How does it break layouts? The ToC entry is truncated and the spoiler heading returns. But the 100 character limit breaks the ToC. I mean, what's the point of the ToC if it lists only some items?

Your first images demonstrates the issue. Compare that with a non-nested spoiler (it is shows the spoiler heading).

Yes.

Unless I am missing something, there is no option for Pages to operate outside of the directory hierarchy (similar to topics) so that when they are moved, external and internal anchors still work correctly. A system to allow Page content organization is very important. As it stands now, reorganizing Pages is a huge headache, where all links must be updated, even Page internal links, ToC, etc. If we could organize pages into a hierarchy in Page Management (AdminCP) and in the front-end menu, but the URL to not reflect this hierarchy, this probably would be optimal. Of course, each page would need an ID to avoid potential conflicts. I could drop use folders in Page Management, but a single list of Pages would become unwieldy and each page would require a unique name.