teraßyte Posted July 15 Posted July 15 (edited) Sending unapproved notifications for moderators without the required causes an undefined array key error: Whoops\Exception\ErrorException thrown with message "Undefined array key "can_view_hidden_MODPERMKEY_MYITEMTITLE"" Stacktrace: #9 Whoops\Exception\ErrorException in \system\Content\Content.php:2635 #8 Whoops\Run:handleError in \system\Content\Content.php:2635 #7 IPS\_Content:sendUnapprovedNotification in \system\Content\Item.php:526 #6 IPS\Content\_Item:createFromForm in \system\Content\Item.php:150 #5 IPS\Content\_Item:create in \applications\MYAPP\sources\MYITEM\MYITEM.php:728 #4 IPS\MYAPP\_MYITEM:create in \applications\MYAPP\modules\front\MYMODULE\index.php:93 #3 IPS\MYAPP\modules\front\MYMODULE\_index:new in \system\Dispatcher\Controller.php:107 #2 IPS\Dispatcher\_Controller:execute in \applications\MYAPP\modules\front\MYMODULE\index.php:39 #1 IPS\MYAPP\modules\front\MYMODULE\_index:execute in \system\Dispatcher\Dispatcher.php:153 #0 IPS\_Dispatcher:run in \init.php:940 The issue is in the \IPS\Content:sendUnapprovedNotification() function when it checks the individual item permissions (lines 2616-2641): try { $container = ( $this instanceof \IPS\Content\Comment ) ? $this->item()->container() : $this->container(); $containerClass = \get_class( $container ); $title = static::$title; if ( isset( $containerClass::$modPerm ) and ( $perms[ $containerClass::$modPerm ] === -1 or ( \is_array( $perms[ $containerClass::$modPerm ] ) and \in_array( $container->_id, $perms[ $containerClass::$modPerm ] ) ) ) and $perms["{$modPermKey}{$title}"] ) { $$varKey = TRUE; } } catch ( \BadMethodCallException $e ) { } The IF check uses $perms["{$modPermKey}{$title}"] directly without first doing an isset() check (like it does for $containerClass::$modPerm ). This happened after I added the content item class to my development board and old moderators set up before it are checked and don't have the field/value set. Edited July 16 by teraßyte Afrodude and SeNioR- 2
Marc Posted July 16 Posted July 16 Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! I can confirm this should be further reviewed and I have logged an internal bug report for our development team to investigate and address as necessary, in a future maintenance release.
teraßyte Posted July 16 Author Posted July 16 Oh, whoops, I meant to fill in the title with more details yesterday, but it ended up as only "[BUG 4.7.17]". I've updated it. 😋
Marc Posted July 16 Posted July 16 46 minutes ago, teraßyte said: Oh, whoops, I meant to fill in the title with more details yesterday, but it ended up as only "[BUG 4.7.17]". I've updated it. 😋 Well, I guess its still accurate 😄 teraßyte 1
Solution teraßyte Posted July 29 Author Solution Posted July 29 This is fixed in 4.7.18 Beta 2. Jim M 1
Recommended Posts