Jump to content

Energizer

Clients
  • Posts

    769
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Energizer

  1. Yes, I've noticed that the IPB 3 limiting myself and I can not implement all things. This but should not be an argument not to do it for 3.x? I do not understand why I can not be determined as an administrator on this Field, but to everybody else? I am responsible for my forum? I do not want, that a developers with such restrictions one root administrator for my forum is. There are many ways and reasons why they might need such capabilities for their forum and there are some other people here who also want this feature. I would be grateful if they could implement it!
  2. Thank you, @Michael! This function is obviously not available. Maybe they can do it for future versions. Thanks!
  3. I did not know that it's not currently possible. It should be administered free of all available fields for the Registration Form. Since the conversion from IPB 2.3 to 3.0, i am not satisfied with the changes in the overall profile fields.
  4. Hello, is it possible the Field for Birthday to make in the Field of the Registration Form? If i move to: ACP -> Custom Profile Field Management. I do not see a box for a birthday, only gender, location and interests. Why missing birthday?
  5. There is no safe forum! Each forum is only safe as long until someone proves the contrary. Many people make no effort to find ways to hack into. Therefore so many people think a forum is safe. A forum is certainly = the earth is a Disc!
  6. I've never been so disappointed, insecure and worried customer here in the forum is experiencing. I think this will impact on the whole confidence to IPS. It's just not fair what they do.
  7. For me, this is nothing more than attempt to holders of Lifetime License to pay to move. You should all consider whether it makes any sense at all such a licensing policy to accept. I think more to a sale of my license as a customer continues to be IPS. It will not be better in the future! The whole reminds me of the past, as has by said that IPB would always be free. Then came but the licensing requirement. When I think of how many forces with IP Nexus was wasted, then I can not understand why lifetime-Licences should pay for Additional services. She have already familiar with the sale of licenses paid. I will in the coming days to make a decision, it's now a pain threshold reached!
  8. That is the problem. Who decides which performance is within the license and what is outside? You can do what they want and more and more services than do non-license sell. Belief that customers really buy two licenses? A lifetime license and a Prepertual Lizenz for the same Product just so they have no disadvantages compared to the normal license? That you can not really be serious!
  9. I also address these concerns and I see all this very critical!
  10. I think the Future IPB Releases are comming faster than previously.
  11. The developers of VB do only what they want and not what their customers want. Requests from customers are ignored. So something will eventually be punished. A DJ may also not only the music to play, what he likes, but he needs to play to what his customers like to hear. If he does not, he will have no more success. It also came with VB. Added to this is that the VB development in recent years has overslept. I have no Pity with VB. When you are with its clients handled, then it deserves nothing else!
  12. Perhaps I have overlooked this, but I find nothing. It would be good if it is in the ACP a recruitment would, where I set the default settings for all members may determine. Who can then make its own settings, as they like. This standard-setting should not only simply the forum software to be defined.
  13. A member in my IPB 3 forum has me instructed that I be settings in the Profile Information make should for him. I can not make this settings for him? Settings for "Enable Profile Comments" "Show my friends in my profile" "Show X latest visitors on my profile?" There should be at least the basic settings for these things in the ACP be selectable can. When A member in my forum can not find the Settings, this understand or need help, I can not help?
  14. There are not alone only lots of little "annoying" bugs. Some things are not properly considered. See you this Discussion in the Bug Tracker: http://forums.invisionpower.com/tracker/issue-12137-custom-profile-fields-error/ http://forums.invisionpower.com/tracker/issue-13551-costum-profil-fields-funktion-error/ I can not make a Upgrade from IPB 2.3.6 of IPB 3.0 and must waiting to IPB 3.1 until the error is resolved. This ist not OK. They exclude me from further use of the IPB 3.0 out. You have made changes to the custom Profil Fields, without the user from IPB 2.3.6 to think.
  15. Please posting this in the bug tracker
  16. only sometimes the site is slow.
  17. Since many years, it give this topics repeatedly with Release-Questions. Since many years give always the same answer. Some people Learning is simply not.
  18. I suspect there will be new features against spam boots in next beta?
  19. I think a major Relesse like IPB 3.0 should be in error judged differently than a point release. It speaks for IPS, the courage that they had such a big change from daring. There are other companies that are afraid of such steps and do not represent the future. I am sure that IPB 3.0 Final good stability will be.
  20. The trend is increasingly in the direction of social networking. It is a characteristic of all known products. IPB 3.0 may be only the beginning like this, there is in this area needs to be done.
  21. What do they think the assessments to change? A star should be divided up into 4 parts. The assessments are too rough. I would like it very much fine. A star should at least be shared half. What do you think?
×
×
  • Create New...