I forget what this is actually called. But Online no longer displays what the member is presently doing on the site. Is this the result of a reset setting (with recent install of 5.0.20), a bug, or something else?

Thanks.

Removed on 5.0.20.

Put it back: https://www.sosinvision.com.br/index.php?/file/596-whos-online-again/

18 hours ago, Adriano Faria said:

Removed on 5.0.20.

Put it back: https://www.sosinvision.com.br/index.php?/file/596-whos-online-again/

Urgh. I missed that. Thanks - I'll take a look at your app.

Edit: Oh. Unfortunately, I use Invision Cloud, so this looks like a no-go for me. Thank you anyway for the reply.

Edited October 26Oct 26 by Como

Unless I am mistaken, its deprecation does not appear in the change log.

Invision, what's the thinking for removing this? Several on our team (including me) find it quite useful.

11 minutes ago, Como said:

Unless I am mistaken, its deprecation does not appear in the change log.

Invision, what's the thinking for removing this? Several on our team (including me) find it quite useful.

https://invisioncommunity.com/forums/topic/487910-online-user-lists/page/2/#findComment-3027062

Thank you for the link @Adriano Faria

That topic is on the Classic forum, and unless someone provides a direct link, I cannot access it (the forum is invisible to Cloud customers; it is not even searchable). So, Cloud customers are even less informed about the deprecation.

As it happens, I do not much disagree with the thrust of @Lindy's comments there, but they were - as I mentioned - inaccessible to me. I never take any notice of 'guests' for the reasons he outlined. And I also agree that members should not have access to that data. No disagreement. But, admins (and perhaps moderators)? That option might have remained. Lindy's reply does not address that.

Anyway, it seems that it is not coming back in any form (unless we are non-Cloud customers and wish to purchase the third-party app).

I just read @Lindy's follow-up post there. I still do not fully agree with the rationale for the total abandonment of the feature, but I do appreciate his effort to respond to the criticisms.