Jump to content



  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Darksbane0 last won the day on October 18 2010

Darksbane0 had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Darksbane0

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Darksbane0's Achievements

  1. Any chance you can clue us in on what the minimum version of jQuery you are expecting to use in 4.0?
  2. One other question, could the correct HTML be cut and paste and retain the data attributes?
  3. Ah I see I actually already have a CKEditor plugin that I use in my 3.3 board that allows a user to search the contents of that file (in case they don't remember the specific option/content combo). So in the new system my plugin could basically do the same thing except it wouldn't insert the BBCode it would insert the custom HTML that the bbcode would have parsed to. That sound correct? If it is, that works I suppose, but does it mean that it would be impossible to manually type in the old bbcode and have it work right?
  4. Can someone explain how this could be accomplished in the new system I have a custom bbcode that goes to a php file that stores an array and looks up some data based on the option/content passed in. So using the option and content I get 4 or 5 pieces of data and then return something like: <a href="DATA1" class="popup" data-more="DATA2" data-stillmore="DATA3">CONTENT OPTION DATA4</a> then I have a prototypejs or jQuery function watching which adds the ability to hover over the link and show the data. Is something like this possible in the new system?
  5. I'm curious, wouldn't it be much easier to just let the BBCode and WYSIWYG live side by side? I don't know but all this talk sounds like most of the problems comes from converting BBCode to the WYSIWYG version but would it really be so bad if I typed in [ b] to bold and then used the button to bold something different and it produced the same results. Then when it is time to edit it displays the BBCode where they entered BBCode and WYSIWYG where they used the buttons?
  6. A lot of work was put into the editor for 3.4.2 and I know that al l our staff will appreciate your comments more than you can know. * edit * - The above is the result of me pressing enter a few times in teh code box and then trying to backspace the extra quote boxes away
  7. Well IPS has commented on this topic multiple times before. I disagree with their position and hate the RTE but I doubt after all this time there is anything we could do to change their mind.
  8. A question Marcher, When uploading an MP3 in your system here does it convert it to the .ipb format? Basically what I'm trying to do is host some podcasts on my site, but because the attachments field converts all mp3 to .ipb it is giving me all types of headaches. The PHP page that converts the file from .ipb to .mp3 will not work in a RSS feed in iTunes and when clicking on the php link to the attachment in iOS it will restart the file constantly (iOS bug I think) which it doesn't do if it links directly to the mp3 file. I'm hoping your system could give me access to the raw mp3 file so I don't have these issues and can link directly to it in a custom RSS feed.
  9. Thats cool Marcher, thanks for looking into it.
  10. It works, I manually changed the URL by replacing the [] with the url encoded version and created a link back to my boards on an external website (exactly like above just with my forum name and tags). The original version with the unencoded [] did not work on the external boards, even if the url was wrapped in quotes in the bbcode. The changed version worked fine and pulled up the correct articles. Even if it didn't work though, IMO it is something that would need changing because it causes this problem for no real reason, other characters could be used as delemiters instead of ones which brake bbcode parsing for an average user that just wants to share a link.
  11. Currently links to tags for IPContent stuff returns something like this FakeForums.com/forums/index.php?/tags/ccs/The+Tag/page__search_app_filters[ccs][searchInKey]__database_1 the presence of the [] in the link/url means that when someone clicks on the tag and copies the link that it can mess up when pasting it to the forums or using it in other places that support bbcode. Most BBCode parsers will break on the extra square brackets. I suggest that the end portion be returned url encoded, like so FakeForums.com/forums/index.php?/tags/ccs/The+Tag/page__search_app_filters%5Bccs%5D%5BsearchInKey%5D__database_1 This would prevent the url from breaking the parser (at least in the places I tested it) and it still works fine when you go to the link. Also if anyone knows of any hooks that fixes this issue please let me know as it causes alot of frustration on my forum when people try to share content tag links.
  12. Anyone else locked out of the support forums right now?
  13. So if BBCode is being phased out what happens to custom BBCode?
  14. Very nice work Marcher, How feasible would it be to add 3 features: Cross Link records like in the normal database relationship? order by field including last updated date? Max results to return? I think I can see how the last two things could be added by modfiying your query in the getFieldValue function and adding the fields to save in the field_extra field, but I can't figure out how the stock database relationship knows to show cross linked records so I'm not sure what would be involved to get yours to do it.
  15. Does anyone have a copy of this working on their boards so I can take a look at it in action?
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use technologies, such as cookies, to customise content and advertising, to provide social media features and to analyse traffic to the site. We also share information about your use of our site with our trusted social media, advertising and analytics partners. See more about cookies and our Privacy Policy