Jump to content


Paulo Freitas

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 



IPS4 Providers

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog



Everything posted by Paulo Freitas

  1. Could any dev take a look into this? I think it's another SEO improvement we can get, a time it's causing SERPs with duplicated content (which isn't good). I think this issue is a good one to pick for 3.1.2, you're taking SEO seriously in the last releases. :-) Cheers,
  2. FYI: I had a problem changing my account e-mail. There was an error, but it worked anyway.

  3. I'm still very busy here but what I can say for now is that there is an quite strange behavior in user profile pages, as you could see here: http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl:"community.invisionpower.com/user/94759-paulo+-freitas"&filter=0 I don't know where they're coming out, but the results with "page__f__" seems a bit buggy and probably dangerous for SEO. Can you take a look on it? :) I'm running against time to have more time to analyze these things, I think we still can optimize a lot more. :D Regards,
  4. Brazil FTW! ;D #bra #worldcup

  5. @felipensp Thank you for the new Function Array Dereferencing (FAD) friend, it's awesome! :) #php http://bit.ly/php-fad

  6. You are the most awesome hacker I know!

  7. You are the most awesome hacker I know!

  8. You are the most awesome hacker I know!

  9. Not, but I know it has very negative impact in not doing this. It seems that IP.Board 3.1 will help this, but the "fix" is not immediate - crawlers are quite slow to remove pages from their index. Regards,
  10. I didn't know precisely, but I think that even returning 403 errors crawlers will waste your traffic unnecessarily. Blocking URLs in robots.txt avoids compliant crawlers to follow these addresses. I can imagine how much this would cost to huge traffic boards. :ermm: Just my POV. :) Regards,
  11. Hi there, I want to start here a discussion in how we can optimize our default robots.txt file to get it updated in future IP.Board versions. :) It's simple: share your experiences. Use services like Google Webmaster Tools, Bing Webmaster Center and Yahoo! Site Explorer to identify wich pages is getting duplicated or is throwing errors/problems in these the crawlers. From what I already detected, (if I'm not wrong) we can block 5 more URLs: Disallow: /*?s= Disallow: /*&s= Disallow: /index.php?app=core&module=global&section=login&do=deleteCookies Disallow: /index.php?app=forums&module=extras&section=rating Disallow: /index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=markasread I still haven't put these lines in my own robots.txt but I tested them in Google Webmaster Tools (GMT) and I'm convicted that will have positive impact to 1) reduce useless indexed pages, 2) reduce duplicated content and 3) reduce HTML suggestions from GMT. For the record: Crawlers hates this: http://www.google.com/search?q=intitle%3A%22Board+Message%22+%22An+Error+Occurred%22+site%3Acommunity.invisionpower.com&filter=0 All these duplicated and useless pages have negative impact to our rank in rigorous crawlers (like Google). We need to block them to reduce our penalty. :( I'm still analysing my GMT reports and I'll update here with all new useless URLs I find. But I want more people involved to share your knowledge. :) Sorry if my english is not perfect, I still need to dedicate more time to learn it. :huh: Best regards,
  12. Pronto, criei contas no PayPal, PagSeguro e MoIP. Só falta ganhar dinheiro com elas. :P

  13. Acabo de criar minha conta no PagSeguro. Alguém querendo doar alguma quantia aí? :P

  14. Uau, acabo de ler no changelog do Fx 3.7a4: Linux builds are now built with -fomit-frame-pointer, improving page load times on average by 4%

  15. I want to say SORRY for those who are already using my userscript for its lack of URLs support. :( I've been very busy these days and so could'nt update it. I improved it just now and I hope you enjoy it. :) (an elegant way to bump a suggestion :lol:) Regards,
  16. The ACP restriction "Can edit ADMINS" include the admin itself or not? o.O

  17. Sounds like a joke, but it isn't. :P It lacks a better visual aspect to allow easier permissions verification. :) I wrote this userscript to meet this need: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/71200 I'll be happier knowing that it will be implemented in the next version. :) Regards,
  18. The current "expected format" behavior is useless. :huh: We need the power of regular expressions. :) Regards,
  19. The expected input format should be also improved: Something like Custom Media BBCodes should be done to custom profile fields, improving expected input format, code replacement, et al. Nowadays it isn't so easy to reach these approaches: Many people input junk data in these fields. :( Regards,
  20. Ok, as we are talking about signatures, while I was editing some settings in my local board I noticed that System Settings > Members > Members Profiles has another 3 signature settings (max_sig_length/sig_allow_html/sig_allow_ibc_yes). Shouldn't all signature settings be configured in the same place for consistency 'n (perhaps) usability? Regards,
  21. I suggested this but in a big feature request topic that evolved very fast and then it probably became forgotten. :ermm: For the record, we already have good settings for them: But we lack a very important one: filesize limit for images. You dev guys probably know that an 1x1px picture could be bigger than an 1920x1080px in filesize, right? We just need to explore a certain header and... Well, I don't need to go into details, right? I can see problematic users doing this and thus it's not what we want, right? :) I can remember IP.Board 2.x days when we got used to use Signatured Limitation mod that had this setting among many others. Do you remember? :) [nostalgia][/nostalgia] That's it. Feedbacks are apreciated. :D Regards,
  22. Thank you. This will save me us a lot of time. :)
  23. That's it. It should be nice if this setting accept a more flexible way to match things, perhaps like the new media BBCode way. A simple change in the system, a big change in the input. :) There's lots of malformed inputs here, it's not good. :ermm: Thank you.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use technologies, such as cookies, to customise content and advertising, to provide social media features and to analyse traffic to the site. We also share information about your use of our site with our trusted social media, advertising and analytics partners. See more about cookies and our Privacy Policy