Dia Mond

Hi Guys it would be great if custom page database could be shown on users profiles as shown below:
 



It will be very useful to show users generated articles  or other custom page database records. 

Please submit your inputs for what you think about this feature. 🙂

Thanks ^_^

Hi Guys it would be great if custom page database could be shown on users profiles as shown below:
 



It will be very useful to show users generated articles  or other custom page database records. 

Please submit your inputs for what you think about this feature. 🙂

Thanks ^_^

Hi,
Is there a way to add "Google One Tap", which is the sign-in with google popup that shows up automatically on page load?
You can find it on many sites, like Stackoverflow, Medium, Kayak, Linkedin, and other large websites.

 
works even better on mobile:

This is the code to call the pop:
<script src="https://accounts.google.com/gsi/client" async defer></script> <script> function handleCredentialResponse(response) { // Handle the response from Google One Tap console.log("Encoded JWT ID token: " + response.credential); // Add your logic to handle the credential response } window.onload = function() { google.accounts.id.initialize({ client_id: 'YOUR_CLIENT_ID', callback: handleCredentialResponse }); google.accounts.id.prompt(); // Display the One Tap prompt }; </script>  
Is it possible to integrate this with Invision Community's sign up/in form?
I already have the "signin with google" obviously, but I really want to trigger this popup when a gues comes to my website.
 

This is not possible in our software at present. If you would like to suggest it for the future, I can move this to our Feedback forum. Please let us know.

If they're intentionally pricing too high so we won't buy it, they it's expected that we complain it's too high 😁
In any case, people should have the freedom to ask for better pricing. Don't be too defensive about it.

Hi Good Morning
IPB Community & Team 
Right Now if user want to create standalone poll (Use Topic Title as Poll Title without separate Topic Title  ) it create duplicate content as Follows






Because poll can't be created without filling out "Poll Title" and "Question Title" Fields




It would be great if user able to create polls without filling out "Poll Title" and "Question Title" Fields Then Polls could be shown as follows which will improve polls UI/UX 





I Hope IPB Team will includes this improvement in upcoming IPB 5

Thanks
Gill

Hi, Kudos to IPB Team 🧡 For Custom Page databases superb features with that kind of flexibility sky's the limit. With Pages we could easily ditch WordPress need for custom Pages and articles. The only feature is missing is able to select multiple categories for same record or article. Wordpress provide that support for that out of box like follows:

 



Sometime same piece of information falls under many different categories rather than just once. so it would be really great if team could also add support for this feature for custom page records. Please submit your inputs for what you think about this feature. 🙂

Thanks
Dia ^_^
 

Plus customizing the output like we do it for display and listing.

Hi Guys it would be great if custom page database could be shown on users profiles as shown below:
 



It will be very useful to show users generated articles  or other custom page database records. 

Please submit your inputs for what you think about this feature. 🙂

Thanks ^_^

Hi Guys it would be great if custom page database could be shown on users profiles as shown below:
 



It will be very useful to show users generated articles  or other custom page database records. 

Please submit your inputs for what you think about this feature. 🙂

Thanks ^_^

Hi, Kudos to IPB Team 🧡 For Custom Page databases superb features with that kind of flexibility sky's the limit. With Pages we could easily ditch WordPress need for custom Pages and articles. The only feature is missing is able to select multiple categories for same record or article. Wordpress provide that support for that out of box like follows:

 



Sometime same piece of information falls under many different categories rather than just once. so it would be really great if team could also add support for this feature for custom page records. Please submit your inputs for what you think about this feature. 🙂

Thanks
Dia ^_^
 

Hi, Kudos to IPB Team 🧡 For Custom Page databases superb features with that kind of flexibility sky's the limit. With Pages we could easily ditch WordPress need for custom Pages and articles. The only feature is missing is able to select multiple categories for same record or article. Wordpress provide that support for that out of box like follows:

 



Sometime same piece of information falls under many different categories rather than just once. so it would be really great if team could also add support for this feature for custom page records. Please submit your inputs for what you think about this feature. 🙂

Thanks
Dia ^_^
 

The alpha testing group probably mostly consists of those who are at least experts or well-versed in using web technology and quick learners. @13.'s suggestion is probably more aligned with how I see normal users using it.

This is fixed in 4.7.17 Beta 2. Marking as resolved.

Thanks @Jim M 🙂 i gonna try pages now You made my Day 🎉

Thanks @Jim M 🙂 i gonna try pages now You made my Day 🎉

All the more reason to support Tiptap in my opinion. We have paid for a pro license and support. We can speak to their dev team in Slack, which has been very helpful. As Matt mentioned, we looked at Lexical but it's very early on in its development and we didn't want to build a castle on shifting sands.

Tiptap is built on ProseMirror, which is a very well tested and robust project.

Hi Kudos to IPB Team they have added tiptap as new editor for IPB5 it looks amazing. But it would be really great if team could also add support for Lexical Editor so admin could choose between tiptap and Lexical for their communities 


Here is Playground Demo Link

https://playground.lexical.dev/


Here some noticeable feature about Lexical Editor:
MIT License (Developed by Facebook Core React Team)
Its headless and built-in excalidraw 
Lets you convert the html content into JSON and vice versa.
React 18+ support. Lexical is very minimal. it's closer to an API for a virtual DOM around content-editable than it is to a text editor framework. That's pretty low-level
Lexical is 22KB gzip. The rest is shipped as plugins that users can seamless plug and play (as they're as independent from the rest, including the real-time collaboration plugin) and you only pay the cost of what you need 

and many more out of box !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Here is Short Video Demo Link
https://i.imgur.com/kCPmiBd.mp4

Please submit your comments and Likes so this feature get enough votes to be added 🙂

Thanks
Dia ^_^

@Matt Finger Thanks for your inputs, I totally agree what you mentioned above, Here My Two Cents:

Only problem with Tiptap is, As they are very small startup as compared to Billion Dollars Facebook. They just recently raised some seed round and they have been surviving by selling Licenses for PRO Features which are freely available in other Text Editors. Sooner or Later there will be less updates for Free Version to push the users to buy premium licenses which will be not good for long term sustainability of IPB Development & IPB Based Communities.

it is true Facebook killed Draft.js ( But Lots of Startups Shut Down Too)
Lexical Now is what Draft.js wanted to be. Lots of developments going on with Lexical right now. Moreover Facebook has very good track records as compared to others to develop Open Source Projects which have been become industry standards.
Thanks!!

@Matt Finger Thanks for your inputs, I totally agree what you mentioned above, Here My Two Cents:

Only problem with Tiptap is, As they are very small startup as compared to Billion Dollars Facebook. They just recently raised some seed round and they have been surviving by selling Licenses for PRO Features which are freely available in other Text Editors. Sooner or Later there will be less updates for Free Version to push the users to buy premium licenses which will be not good for long term sustainability of IPB Development & IPB Based Communities.

it is true Facebook killed Draft.js ( But Lots of Startups Shut Down Too)
Lexical Now is what Draft.js wanted to be. Lots of developments going on with Lexical right now. Moreover Facebook has very good track records as compared to others to develop Open Source Projects which have been become industry standards.
Thanks!!

@Matt Finger Thanks for your inputs, I totally agree what you mentioned above, Here My Two Cents:

Only problem with Tiptap is, As they are very small startup as compared to Billion Dollars Facebook. They just recently raised some seed round and they have been surviving by selling Licenses for PRO Features which are freely available in other Text Editors. Sooner or Later there will be less updates for Free Version to push the users to buy premium licenses which will be not good for long term sustainability of IPB Development & IPB Based Communities.

it is true Facebook killed Draft.js ( But Lots of Startups Shut Down Too)
Lexical Now is what Draft.js wanted to be. Lots of developments going on with Lexical right now. Moreover Facebook has very good track records as compared to others to develop Open Source Projects which have been become industry standards.
Thanks!!

I can say supporting multiple editor frameworks is not something we're likely to consider. Editors today are not copy/paste bundles, and there is a lot of stuff we built on top of the core frameworks.
Thousands of lines of code which use the Tiptap and Prosemirror APIs would need to be translated, then all the edge cases would need to be sorted out. After migrating from CKEditor4 to CKEditor5, then from CKEditor5 to Tiptap, I can definitively say from experience that is a lot of work, and there are always differences in how features are actually implemented. And that's not even covering extensions which would be a pain to make compatible.
This is why sticking to one editor is the way to go to provide you and all our customers top notch features. We won't lose days, or potentially even weeks, going back and forth to double implement and test features as they come out, and can guarantee things will "work".
As a side note, I actually do remember Lexical from when we initially compared editors. We didn't find it to be a great option because it's very new: they are still only on version 0.15.0.
Also, not too long before Lexical came out, Facebook first created Draft.js, then abandoned it when it was only a couple years old before version 1 ever came out. In fact, I think a lot of the docs that are now available for Lexical didn't even exist 6 months back.

It is Obvious for Future Consideration. IPB Team will not able to deliver TOP Notch Forum Software what we see today if they were afraid of features developments in past. Moreover it is close to framework that team already familiar with, So it won't take too long to implement. Most of heavy lifting is already done by Facebook lexical team, It is Standard Development Practice to ditch current and old ones for better ones   !!

Hi Kudos to IPB Team they have added tiptap as new editor for IPB5 it looks amazing. But it would be really great if team could also add support for Lexical Editor so admin could choose between tiptap and Lexical for their communities 


Here is Playground Demo Link

https://playground.lexical.dev/


Here some noticeable feature about Lexical Editor:
MIT License (Developed by Facebook Core React Team)
Its headless and built-in excalidraw 
Lets you convert the html content into JSON and vice versa.
React 18+ support. Lexical is very minimal. it's closer to an API for a virtual DOM around content-editable than it is to a text editor framework. That's pretty low-level
Lexical is 22KB gzip. The rest is shipped as plugins that users can seamless plug and play (as they're as independent from the rest, including the real-time collaboration plugin) and you only pay the cost of what you need 

and many more out of box !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Here is Short Video Demo Link
https://i.imgur.com/kCPmiBd.mp4

Please submit your comments and Likes so this feature get enough votes to be added 🙂

Thanks
Dia ^_^

Instead of patching these issues, the entire functionality should probably be reimagined. Having this forum posting to begin with comes from old 3.x days where everything was centered around the forums. Having the need to have a separate comment system for Pages comes from the fact that 4.x originally allowed people to just have Pages, but not Forums. With the new licensing system, these legacy options should be consolidated into one comment system without the need for any kind of syncing, cross-posting or any anything like that.