David N.

The ideal solution would be if any photo/video format could be converted on the fly to something useable, the way Facebook does it.

Ok so you made your point that you don't agree, but this is my feature suggestion. 😃 Maybe keep the current way of tallying the percentages and make my suggestion an option that you are free to select or not. To me it's more useful to know that 100% of voters voted for chocolate, than to know that 66% of the votes casted were for chocolate. I have never seen any poll where each voter can select multiple answers tally percentages like that, but I would love to see an example if you can share one? In the example I shared in my original post, the poll was something like this: What you use Invision Community for? A forum A blog An eCommerce platform A gallery A calendar ... so once the votes are tallied, I want to see something like this: A forum [ 78% ] A blog [ 42% ] An eCommerce platform [ 53% ] A gallery [ 21% ] A calendar [ 38% ] So that I can quickly conclude "78% of IC users are using it for a forum". Here are examples of such polls:

Call it what you want, and then maybe I want a survey and not a polll. In my example where 10 out of 10 voters vote "Chocolate" and 5 out of 10 voters vote "Vanilla", what's the point in getting a result that 66.6% of votes are "Chocolate"? I have no interest in that number. If you do, great, only I'm making here a feature suggestion that I think I should have at least the option of counting the percentage of voters, not votes. Out of curiosity, can you give me a concrete example of when you would be interested in getting that 66.6% value? What does it represent?

Yes, exactly. It's a fifty percent for both options if you count the votes, but it's 100% on both if you count the voters. I want to count the voters. Which ice cream flavors do you like? Chocolate or Vanilla? If 10 persons answer and: 5 of them answer only Chocolate, 5 of them answer both Chocolate and Vanilla, Then I want the poll results to reflect that: 100% of voters picked Chocolate, 50% of voters picked Vanilla.

Got it, thanks Jim. I've posted in the Feedback forum, there:

When creating a multiple answer poll, the poll tallies the percentage of votes. I wish it would tally the percentage of voters instead. For example in the results below, 53 voters out of 69 have voted for the 2nd answer, I would like to see 76.81% (of voters), and not 22.94% (of votes):

When a poll allows for multiple answers, the percentage are tallied as a percent of answers, when they should be tallied a a percent of voters? For example below, 53 voters out of 69 have selected the 2nd answer, that should be 76.81% and not 22.94%?

I added my suggestion in the feedback forum:

That wouldn't be accurate, since the last visited time is updated when the user session times out. And I'm not interested in knowing when a user last signed in anyway. I wish "Last Visited" on the profile page would display "Online Now" while the user is online, just like in the hover card.

Great, it works! Thanks again. 🙂

Thanks a lot! And how can I access that variable inside a script (in JavaScript)?

I am adding a javascript to my global header that will run only if the user is logged in. I've placed the javascript inside this if statement. {{if \IPS\Member::loggedIn()->member_id}} {{endif}} In the script, I need to to replace a variable with the currently logged-in user's email address, either plaintext or encrypted sha256, however I'm not sure how to get that email address?

Last Visited should state "Online Now" when a user is still online (the same way the hover card currently displays it). The way it works now is a bit odd, as mentioned in the following threads:

Got it, will do.

Yes, I read what @Matt wrote. I understand the technical reason behind the behavior. I also agree with Matt that it looks odd (to say the least), and I am hoping that a better solution can be implemented. IMO the profile page should say "online now" until the user's session times out. I don't suppose there should be a privacy concern since we can already see "online now" in the user's hover card anyway?

I am also seeing this in my community, for example a user last visited 33 minutes ago but posted 9 minutes ago. Or here's another example:

Turns out it's not a cache issue; the issue was reported before there:

Ok I suppose this was the first time I experienced this. Will let you know if that reoccurs. Thanks Marc.

The user came back so now his "last visited" time has been updated. If this occurs again, what additional information should I provide?

A user posted something 8... well now it's 9 minutes ago. When I click the username to go to the profile, it says he last visited 33 minutes ago.

Like that? If so, it's probably simply a case of them quoting the content then copying the quote and pasting into an existing quote...and rinse/repeat. Quoting works the way you see it - 1 level. But there are ways around it, as mentioned. Got it, thanks. 🙂

I searched my ACP for 'quote' and 'quoting' but didn't find anything. I thought I had limited my quoting level to 1. Meaning, if user A posts something, and user B quotes user A and answers, and I try to quote the whole post by user B, only what B wrote is inside the quote in my post, it automatically strips the quote from A. Now this works for me, limiting my quote to only whoever I'm quoting, and not who they had quoted. And yet I just saw a regular member quote someone's quote... I'm not sure where to go to double-check my settings?

I am revisiting this topic, as there's still a GUI confusion here. In the image below: the green ✔️ Following button indicates that I am following. If I click it, I will NOT be following. the green ✔️ Going button indicates that I am NOT going. If I click it, then I will be going. Same buttons, same wording, same symbol, same color coding - and yet opposite functionality. IMO, a green checkmark symbol and button should indicate that I am already doing something - like with the Following button.

Will do, thank you.

All of this was the case, yes, however now the problem has sorted itself out (there are now 4 members who have voted). I assume maybe some kind of caching issue?