bfarber

The ability to order images randomly in widgets was added as well. Sorry for forgetting to mention that!

The ability to order images randomly in widgets was added as well. Sorry for forgetting to mention that!

The ability to order images randomly in widgets was added as well. Sorry for forgetting to mention that!

The ability to order images randomly in widgets was added as well. Sorry for forgetting to mention that!

The ability to order images randomly in widgets was added as well. Sorry for forgetting to mention that!

The ability to order images randomly in widgets was added as well. Sorry for forgetting to mention that!

The ability to order images randomly in widgets was added as well. Sorry for forgetting to mention that!

Thanks for the reply. I still think this will be a big improvement and look forward to 4.2.

Very impressive!
Looks more and more like 4.2 will be a real watershed for the Invision suite!

Yes
 
As for categorization of clubs, as has been mentioned you can set up whatever custom fields you like and filter by those fields (so you could have one called "Subject" with options "Food", "Car", etc.). This is a situation where I think it is probably best to wait and see and play with the implementation first, before deciding whether you think additional organization tools are needed.

Yes
 
As for categorization of clubs, as has been mentioned you can set up whatever custom fields you like and filter by those fields (so you could have one called "Subject" with options "Food", "Car", etc.). This is a situation where I think it is probably best to wait and see and play with the implementation first, before deciding whether you think additional organization tools are needed.

Agreed, and keep in mind that we have a vibrant marketplace and many talented developers who are great at filling perceived gaps in functionality.
 

Yup, there's already a check there
 

4.2 done.

I don't think you understand the changes. :smile:

Soft delete IS "hide". It is the same thing. So if you don't give mods hard delete but do give them soft delete....you already do exactly what we have recommended - do not give moderators delete ability, but give them "hide" ability.

You can control whether moderators see hidden content or not. So if moderators want it "gone", then simply don't let them see hidden content, and when they hide it - it's gone.
 
If you have to, you can rename "Hide" for your moderators to "Delete", and the end result is a moderator clicks "Delete", the item is gone from their view, and you as the administrator can later go restore or mass-delete these hidden items.  It's the exact same workflow.
 

1) Our software has not been available since 1998
2) Virtually none of our competitors retain deleted content for later "really really" deletion, so we are not stepping away from any common convention
3) We only began retaining "deleted" content in an extremely recent version (3.3 or 3.4). Before that, as almost everyone would expect, when you deleted a topic or post...it was deleted.




What you already do on your site is effectively accounted for, as with almost everyone else who has replied with concerns. :smile: I realize no one likes to read "we are removing x", but this is a situation where we have opted to go with a simpler route that behaves as most users would expect (except for a small handful who are intimately familiar with the internal workings of recent versions of IP.Board), and that does not materially change any existing capabilities.