Jump to content

bfarber

Clients
  • Posts

    163,911
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    346

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Projects

Release Notes v5

Invision Community 5 Bug Tracker

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by bfarber

  1. It only does that when you click on the image to view it full size. You can click on the image a second time to "shrink" it back down. I don't personally consider this "breaking the forum layout". The forum layout is fine, but if a member wants to temporarily view the full sized image they can click on it to see the image as it was originally intended. That said, you could possibly revert to the old behavior with some javascript modifications. You can try posting in the resource forums for assistance with that.
  2. We will be providing more information on this soon. Our priorities have been with IPB and getting it fixed up and stable for as many customers as possible first. :)
  3. I'm afraid I don't know when it will be released. I know our customers like some sort of timeline for the things we do, but realistically it's very hard to give you a timeframe. As sparc suggested, the sooner the bugs are sorted out and cleaned up, the quicker we'll be able to include it. :)
  4. Ah, your ticket just managed to hit awful timing. Was submitted Friday afternoon (so no one got to it before leaving for the day), then of course had to wait all weekend... I'm sorry for the delay, but looks like it has been addressed now. :) Your ticket is about 1 day old (as of right now). I'd imagine it will be replied to today.
  5. You don't "open" img tags....I'm not sure how you'd open them in a new window. Imgs that are linked with an anchor tag would be covered by this setting already.
  6. It would be kind of hard to guarantee anything at this point I'm afraid. Hopefully, we should have a GDK available for it when it's ready to be released. I'm not sure if anyone can really give you a straight yes or no at this stage, however.
  7. What's the ticket number? In general, first-level support tickets are responded to pretty quickly. Within our time frame, and generally within a few hours (though naturally we're pretty busy right now). Tickets that get escalated (which I'm currently going through) tend to take a bit longer. If I come in and there are 16 tickets, and it takes me 2 hours to do each ticket, and there's 8 hours in a day....well, you can do the math. ;) It's just the nature of the issues by the time they're escalated. :)
  8. There's a possible solution built into IPB, depending on your preferences. There's a setting called "Remove default forums navigation" (search for "navigation" in live search) that will make it so when you are in another application, it becomes the "home" in the breadcrumb trail. In this case, your portal would be the first entry (instead of the board index). Of course this applies to all applications, but it might be a viable solution for you.
  9. All it takes is someone to report where they don't work. :) I'm sure it would take minimal effort to support the javascript in the portal and profile.
  10. You see, I'm exactly the opposite. I get *extremely* annoyed when I click a link and it suddenly spawns a new window. I then have to remember to close the window instead of just clicking back, and I have an extra button my taskbar (when I already have 20 programs opened typically). To each their own. Tis why we added a setting to let external links open in a new window. We can certainly add the javascript to execute in the profile screen (for example) if it's not executing there. Honestly, I don't understand what the big deal is. There's a setting to do what you want. Why do you guys care if we used javascript or an attribute that isn't valid (and thus, could potentially not work in future browsers)? If the setting isn't working in, for example, profiles - report that as a bug and be done with it. We'll fix it there, problem solved.
  11. Actually, I'd submit a ticket on this. No one else has reported this issue, and when it's something affecting one person a ticket is the best way to go. If we discover a bug while working on a ticket, we will of course fix it for the rest of our customers.
  12. I am not positive exactly which version CleanCut will be available for.
  13. You can edit the status from the ACP edit member page
  14. I got tired of all the bug reports about the backwards-question-mark reversing the order of the stuff following it, so I've edited the topic title. :thumbsup:
  15. The number under "Out of Date" entries is a link. Clicking on it will show you all the out of date strings in that language group.
  16. You would need to add a language string with the following: $app . '_display_title' So, for example, for "Blog" you would add blog_display_title You would want to add it to the core_public_global language group in the ACP.
  17. bfarber

    How to renew?

    In case anyone stumbles across this wondering the same thing, yes you can renew at any time for $25.00/6 months, even if your license is expired.
  18. bfarber

    Support

    I'm glad to hear. :D
  19. Ah, ok. Can't speak for any past tickets. Each one would be addressed on a case-by-case basis I'm sure. Hopefully our current level of service is improving, in any event. :)
  20. Indeed, please report piracy to the form provided. :) Thanks!
  21. It will be included by default, but I don't think we intend to make it *the* default skin.
  22. Are we looking at the correct ticket? Perhaps there's another ticket we're not aware of? :unsure: We guarantee a 48-hour turn around on tickets last I checked, so a response in under 30 minutes is well within that time. I'm really not sure how we could make it any quicker than that, in fact. At least with everything going on right now. :unsure: Like I said, maybe you have another ticket and we're just not looking at the same issue?
  23. bfarber

    [p]Code BB Code

    For the record there is no bbcode to create a paragraph. I'd recommend against it, in fact, because it has the potential to break the layout (for those technically minded, think XHTML STRICT doctype + custom bbcodes with HTML tags not allowed in block elements, etc. etc.)
  24. Not every form submission needs to use ajax in my opinion. I'm fine with a good ol "submit to server, refresh page" form submission now and then...
  25. Because there is no "CC" option anymore. It's a conversation, not a one-to-one message.
×
×
  • Create New...