PatrickRQ

Hi IPS, Can you bring and option to next release allowing us to disable send of email/notification upon upload of new file version in Downloads app? The option is useful to avoid useless spam of member's mail box and to avoid misleading notification of "new version". Happens we need to reupload specific version of file, e.g. to correct some file mistake we did, change that does not require everyone to re-download a file. There is no need to bother members every time in such situation. A simple on/off toggle upon upload of new version would be very useful. Can you please bring it to nest maintenance release? Thank you.

I am getting similar issue but with resource images. Any finding? random images getting lost randomly.

What I mean is that the ACP session timeout setting does not work SO when it gets terminated after default 3600 seconds the 2FA timeout setting has no effect if I want to set it greater than 3600 seconds. In other words, one bug affects two features.

Yeah, that's why I said I can't make an use of 2FA timeout because ACP session timeout is not respected.

I have set 2FA timeout to 12, then changed to 1 day.. I am still prompted to fill 2FA security code every 1h. I connected it because you say 2FA is being reset once session ends. So, if ACP session is closed (after default 1h) the 2FA still will be requested.

It does nto work well because of this "The user will always be prompted again on a new session." and this as long as I am unable to configure ACP session timeout the MFA timeout is useless.

I also experience the same issue. Configured via constants.php \define( 'ACP_SESSION_TIMEOUT', 86400 );

Hi, Where I can modify MFA timeout for google? It is a bit annoying to reach phone every 1h or less. I also ask to lift my posting moderation finally.

"Every night in my dreams.. I see you.. I feeel you.."

I meant if I can pay in Euro on your site. I see the gateway listed under ruble.

Nice. Have payment in Euro available?

Yeah, Stripe and PayPal are very unfriendly and steal from you on currency exchange rates. Even worst local currency exchange shops do not have such bad rate as PayPal - fair enough I can put currency exchange differences as company cost but still loosing on it. With Revolut I pay pretty fair commission and still a lot is left in my pocket.

To be honest, I wonder why IPS did not leave marketplace as platform for sellers and instead closure could introduce e.g. monthly, constant payments, then instead taking money directly, could allow seller to define the target payment method. I use my Commerce this way, so when buyer comes to purchase something he sees who he buys from (exact details) and this way I am responsible for nothing, except colleting money for using the platform. My only guess is that IPS wanted to get a rid of all custom apps/plugins before IPSv5

Hi IPS, I know you explained inability of efficient implementation of such for self-hosted solutions, however, would you be able to add ability to manually mark accounts to do not send emails to? It would help bounce back in case of using bulk-email send. For now I manually review our inbox and do the same with some workaround to prevent massive bound-backs when sending bulk emails. Having ability to mark accounts with some DB stored flag would help a lot, as I could automate the process without use of custom plugins etc. I think many others could find the ability useful too. Thanks

Hello, Each time I perform update of Commence, the "On Hold" becomes available to customer. I set it back to be used my staff only, perform Commerce update and it is becomes available to customer again.

Hi IPS, Please consider ability of extending links in footer by guidelines, cookies, terms of use, same way you do with privacy, etc Examples: <li><a href='{url="app=core&module=system&controller=cookies" seoTemplate="cookies"}'>{lang="Cookies"}</a></li> <li><a href='{url="app=core&module=system&controller=terms" seoTemplate="terms"}'>{lang="terms_of_use"}</a></li> {{if \IPS\Settings::i()->gl_type != 'none'}} <li><a href='{{if \IPS\Settings::i()->gl_type == "internal"}}{url="app=core&module=system&controller=guidelines" seoTemplate="guidelines"}{{else}}{setting="gl_link"}{{endif}}'>{lang="guidelines"}</a></li> {{endif}}

@Lindy There is plenty of changes you, IPS, introduced recently. Some are scary, some leave a room for fear of what next.. I could read you say you are about to improve providers directory.. however.. for years there is area of your community that remains same for years.. feedback/suggestions. Are you going to take closer look on improvement on that area, so you implement more requested features in much higher frequency than it was till now? That could be great equivalent/replacement for retired Marketplace.

I believe you see everything but sometimes requests need to be reminded. It also works like showing to other people importance of the gateway as it saves their money directly, as Revolut is much more friendly and cheaper - I use it already giving direct pay link to customers who would like to use it.

Bumping up the suggestion. It is great alternative for aggressive PayPal.

A question, if I click that button: Will I get offered first of how my payment will look like and what is the updated EULA? I ask as I do not want to get upgraded right after clicking the button 😛

Can you tell me where to find the ticket, please?

Hello IPS, I experience and issue with PayPal payments where specific scenario may be not handled properly. My report requires sensitive data to be provided so please tell me a way I can give it to you. @Marc Stridgen you can use what i already sent you. The issue I describe now started happening after upgrade of PayPal API you had within last few maintenance updates. 1. Payer process a payment 2. Payment is refused on Commerce side, transaction gets following status: Refused Payer cannot pay for this transaction. Please contact the payer to find other way to pay for this transaction. The transaction received payment reference from PayPal, that means payment was processed on their end. BTW, what the error really means? it is very general and does not tell about real reason why Payer could not pay. The transaction is authorized on PayPal end but by some reason it requires me to perform manual action, either cancel or claim the money. Not sure why it happens randomly to random buyers. 5. Now, even I claim the money the associated transaction/invoice will not be marked as paid/processed. Will have to manually handle that. Notes: in Commerce, I do not see any pending transactions requiring action. It is possible this is some sort of not well handled case? because transaction wasn't really refused. Shouldn't this be located under tab of transactions requiring manual action? Thanks

Maybe not much helpful answer but I suggest to start from prayer 😂 faith may help here.. telling you from own experience of upgrading from 3.4.6 and the faith aspect.

Great to hear. Without this I have to reply tones of tickets and explain questions "whyyyyyyyyy?!?!?!?!?! 😱"

Feel free to move it to suggestions, no point to duplicate the content. However, I can't agree you cannot handle within regular maintenance release. It is just like adding custom item under custom invoice > add item > discount and pass the value on discount field of PayPal's API 😉