Jump to content

Marcher Technologies

Clients
  • Posts

    17,657
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    98

 Content Type 

Profiles

Downloads

IPS4 Providers

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Forums

Store

Status Replies posted by Marcher Technologies

  1. Wanted: 36 hour day

  2. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      and rather than griping about it(we BOTH see the problems of current status quo) why not check your PM's? I propose rather than waiting on Farber to make IPC what it SHOULD be, why not work together to do something about it?
      Your gripes are many of my own gripes (that 90-query test actually executed faster than the default articles frontpage.)

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  3. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      no... because that would imply it was a fix... which by no means it is...
      im stating that with 3.2.x just hit, i certainly could not expect the developers to drop everything to revolutionize how ipc works.... could you?
      im surprised it only took that month for the call to be made to revert the change.

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  4. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      and in honesty... im agreeing with you... i personally think blocks should not use the database... for obvious reasons(a query running from data pulled by a query is never good)
      .xml would be a wiser solution, but all that being said, the timing was and still is atrocious.

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  5. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      EG, the exact reason feature implementations are rarely done BY IPS in minor point versions... stability is always preferable to a minor performance increase.... that "bug" report killed the stability of IPC, for the longest-running time of any IPC bug.

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  6. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      Additionally, I completely agree that it should be stored in an .xml... it should not even use the db, BUT, there is a time and place to investigate that... and THAT was not it.... we have enough to handle with upgrading IPC manually... did not need to deal with this at such a time.

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  7. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      on a high-scale server(thanks for basically saying i only work for no-names) 90 optimized queries on a single page-load has a quicker execution time than 1 poorly optimized query....
      it was a simple buildAndFetch/update you griped about... very simply an efficient quick db pull/update... again you assume much, like the assumption raw query count is any sort of reliable indicator of performance.

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  8. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      and no... by its very nature... a dynamic 0 cache block parses data based on the current user.... as such what the template parses to(which is how it is stored) would update based on that users info... * cache blocks dont update to any cache... because the relevant parsed info is already stored... 0-cache is dynamic as you well know... it was updating a cached copy for that user.

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  9. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

  10. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      the issue is.... it was 2 extra queries... and guess what... removing them does speed the exec time in the slightest... so was it worth it?

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  11. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      Call it unfair if you will, but that "bug report" has thus far cost me 30+hrs additional work working with custom blocks... and I DO thank you for that.

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  12. It's my fault I reported a bug and they ######ed up the fix? You seriously responded to me as if You think i was the one who screwed up the fix. It works fine on my board just sayin.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      It was not a bug in the first place.... raw queries are not an indicator of performance.... execution time is... it became a bug when they attempted to "fix" something that was not broken in the first place, therefore yes.

    2. (See 17 other replies to this status update)

  13. Civil Service... is it not GRAND? Jury Duty... 09/25/11-??/??/11?

  14. I LIKE the new menu!

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      Spot on IPS... all the short terms that never returned are searchable... css, js, php, sql... <3

    2. (See 9 other replies to this status update)

  15. I LIKE the new menu!

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      AND WOW, it accepts CSS as a term <3... search code reworks?

    2. (See 9 other replies to this status update)

  16. The following search terms are not allowed and were removed from your query: javascript .... wtf.. I need to search for that term in IP.Technical Support.

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      >., im fairly certain EVERYTHING would return... think about it.

    2. (See 5 other replies to this status update)

  17. ModernAdmin is now free, Enjoy this smooth skin, great for any type of forum! - http://community.invisionpower.com/files/file/4354-modernadmin-32-skin/

  18. Needs a Skinner that can work with IP.Content !

    1. Marcher Technologies

      Marcher Technologies

      There Quite Honestly aren't enough of us to go around... I've been swamped.

    2. (See 3 other replies to this status update)

  19. I swear there's a board missing from the first category here..... :\

  20. Were is the visual skin editor i gave the acp a quick scan and cant find it

  21. Upgrading an IN_DEV board is a pain. :D

  22. File/Blog Awaitting approval, sneak peek http://www.marchertech.com/ (hint, pages)

  23. File/Blog Awaitting approval, sneak peek http://www.marchertech.com/ (hint, pages)

×
×
  • Create New...