Sonya*

When I enter my purchase list...

I would like to "clean" the list of my purchases here. The most apps there are outdated, belong to 3.x, are not active, not available, cannot be renewed and so on. I would like to be able to delete or at least hide them from my list. This way I can better overview the applications I really use and need to upgrade. And I would appreciate if I could sort the purchases by renew date or status.

Hi,
The current version of IPS generates Schema.org tags automatically. I have a few suggestions to improve this feature.
These tags are automatically generated in the Pages app, but all databases receive the "Article" schema.
For example, if my database is a database with books, it still receives an "Article" schema at the end of the page, whereas a "Book" schema would be more appropriate.
To solve this, I customized our "Books" database template to use "microdata", so our books have the correct Schema tags. So, we end up with two schemas for the record, one saying that it is a book and another saying it an article.
So, I'd prefer to disable the Schema.org tags generated automatically by IPS per database. I don't know if the current version has this feature already. If not, that is my first suggestion, for advanced cases where we'd prefer to configure microdata manually with a custom template.
Also, for database with news, the "NewsArticle" schema would be more appropriate, so maybe a configuration to select between Article/NewsArticle?
My second suggestion is regarding the "description" tag, that is missing. It would be great if we could configure it somehow, e.g., pointing out which field stores the article description. If empty, fill it with the meta description tag. And, if that is empty as well, get the first sentence from the article.
Anyway, just my two cents.
Cheers!
 

Still desperately needed.
We have some auxiliary databases that are only used for database relationship in other databases. The records in such databases do not make sense standalone. I would like to exclude those auxiliary databases from sitemap. They have a lot of records that do not really contain any helpful information on its own. 

Still desperately needed.
We have some auxiliary databases that are only used for database relationship in other databases. The records in such databases do not make sense standalone. I would like to exclude those auxiliary databases from sitemap. They have a lot of records that do not really contain any helpful information on its own. 

I can certainly use it this way as well. Just to display tables with structured data. These are lists or collections of something, cars, pets, children and so on.
I have default templates in database. If I create a database I do not need to define custom template for it. I can just use (select) one that is delivered with Pages (Record view, List view and so on). I can customize it, but I am not forced to. So for the clubs I could select templates that clubs owner are allowed to use. Nothing more. Just dropdown field the same way it works now in ACP, where I select predefined templates for new databases.
I am aware of this. My post was just an example of usage for my own needs. How I would use it if there were a possibility to create a database per Club. I have just reacted to your post where you have written it were not practical. For me it IS and that is how I would use it. For creating club based collections and listings (spreadsheets). 

Maybe my wish comes true... This Christmas? Some impressions from my Manage Purchase list:

Hello, our file is currently added and is awaiting approval.
You can contact any author of the application and directly ask about the terms and plans for updating the application, I think no one will refuse you an answer.

Me trying to understand if I should panic or not 

Thanks for the insight, newbie LAC.
I don't understand what it is, or why it exists. It has untranslated strings, and it is turned on without granting it access, potentially exposing privileged information about advertising campaigns and impressions without any advance indication it would do so.
I'd encourage you to reconsider turning on something like this only as an explicit opt-in.

I've logged a bug report, thanks. In the future feel free to submit issues like this through the developer gateway forum or through a ticket in your client area.

A case:
User A posts status update User B comments on this status update User A makes another comment on the same status update User B receives a notification with the title "Reply to a comment on your status feed". Further, in the notification the link to the User's A profile can be found. The link is titled with "Go to your profile".  In both cases is "your" false. It should be "Reply to User A's status feed" and the link should be "Go to User A's profile".

Curious, is there a reason not to just break this subset of Club users who only would have access to a specific "forum" to another Club? 

There is a free plugin to remove the behavior
 

I like it. I've made that change and pushed an update to the marketplace. It's pending approval.

Not right now. The permission for the club category are overloaded with club permission. If the club is public, then everybody can create records. If open - only club members. If closed or private, the records are not shown anywhere else except of in the club. Restricting add permission to club owner only can be done in the future version.
No, the permission to add a club feature is (like for any other feature) set on the group permission. It does not depend on club type or certain club values. This can be done as custom solution.
Generally yes. But I am not able to make any urgent work right now due to pandemic measurements that are unpredictable. I depend entirely on kindergarten child care. If it is suddenly not available, then I am not available either. Unfortunately. 

I use this query SQL on each InnoDB table
 
SET storage_engine=MYISAM; ALTER TABLE table_name ENGINE = MyISAM;  

 

We're really not liking the way that the theme installations are working in 4.5, given that it seems to neglect the ability to work on a theme in a development environment. 

It is essential for us to ensure that our themes (and CMS) are running properly after each update. Before doing anything on our live, we get everything sorted on our development install and then move it to our live. However, the changes in 4.5 and the way one adds a theme has made this a bit of a nightmare. One cannot use the admin panel's marketplace on a test install - so it becomes difficult to then do any kind of testing and customization when there is an update.

After chatting with the IPS support, we were told to reach out to the theme developers and ask for a theme installation file to be sent through. This isn't a great methodology when one then needs to contact the theme developers each update in the hopes that they check their DMs and send it through in a timely manner. 

We have custom code that regularly needs to be tweaked in accordance with updates, so we're not looking forward to go through this each time there is a new update.

There surely has to be a smoother way of ensuring that installing themes on a development environment isn't such a challenge. Surely most websites are working on a development environment when testing out new updates?!

** While this problem persists for those developing on a local environment. An online dev environment will work.

This was brought up internally already for discussion. I can't say when or if it might be done, but just wanted to note your suggestion was seen.

I am afraid,only IPS can solve the issue with your license key and support. @bfarber already addressed it in your other topic 
 I would wait till they resolve the issue described, then create a support ticket. I know it is annoying to wait, but community cannot help with it.

This app allows creating club features based on the Pages databases. E. g. if you have an Articles database, the app will allow the clubs‘ owners to create articles within the club. Any database that exists in Pages can be added to the club. The permission for databases is defined in the the clubs permissions for each user group. Only databases that use categories can be used in clubs. Visit a demo club to see how it looks like.
Features:
Set per group permission for every database in the group settings Database category permissions are replaced by club permissions Club header is added to category index and record Club owner can change the category name and description Show records in the club overview tab Clubs use database templates for Category List, Record, and Record Form set in the database settings NOTE: Pages must be installed and enabled to use this app.

You do not need to mess with your themes to place custom blocks on individual pages. These are simple IFs and it worth to try even if you are not a coder.
Example 1:
In your AdminCP create a custom block with manual HTML:
{{if strpos( \IPS\Request::i()->path, 'partner' ) !== FALSE}} {advertisement="my_custom_ad"} {{endif}} This block would display an advertisement placed in custom location my_custom_ad on the page _http://yourdomain.com/partner
Then place the block with Block Manager where you would like to have it.
Example 2:
{{if strpos( \IPS\Request::i()->path, 'companies/cars' ) !== FALSE}} {block="my_custom_block"} {{endif}} This block would display a custom block with the key my_custom_block on the page _http://yourdomain.com/companies/cars
Give it a try 😉

You can try this guide 
 

Ingore me, refresh and you'll see 

My submission has been rejected for something that has been part of the widget since day one. That's me done with development on this platform, I'm sorry, but I won't be reuploading any more version of this or my other plugins.